Quantcast
Channel: frieze blog
Viewing all 448 articles
Browse latest View live

Highlights 2013 - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

$
0
0

By Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

Terrence Malick, To the Wonder (2013), film still

Nana Oforiatta-Ayimis a writer and filmmaker based in Accra, Ghana, where she runs the cultural research platform, ANO.

FILM:
Terrence Malick, To the Wonder
Watching this I sometimes felt as restless as you do on a long train journey when there is nothing but the same expanse of landscape stretching on for miles, your mind still too attuned to what has just been left behind to fully rest in its stillness. There were also moments I felt irritated by the camera’s constant, travelling gaze over Marina, the main female character, by her portrayal as endlessly winsome, lithe, childlike. It made me feel caged in and reminded me of the potential reductiveness of the male lens, especially as the way Malick portrayed the characters seemed somehow archetypal. But as the film progressed the admiration for the beauty of the cinematography and of the film’s rhythm gave way to awe of what Malick was doing. Through the structure, the narrative, the editing, the characters, he had managed to create a kind of cinema of the metaphysical, capturing in just two hours the seeming inescapability of human suffering; the striving for and elusiveness of transcendence and connection; the banality and loneliness of being trapped within our selves; the all-too-brief escape of romantic love; the immanence, despite all this, of beauty. The way he managed to counter conventional characterisation with characters almost devoid of particularities that instead of ending in stereotype, reached towards a universality of experience.

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

‘In Order To Join’, Museum Abteiberg, Mönchengladbach, 2013


ART:
‘In Order To Join’, Museum Abteiberg, Mönchengladbach, Germany
Exhibitions with generalised categories such as ‘India’, ‘Africa’, or ‘Women’ often leave one with the impression that the included artists have been put together to give them some presence within a cultural landscape that does not yet seem to have more nuanced spaces for them. ‘In Order to Join’, a show of women artists born between 1947 and 1957 and specifically of work created in the 1970s, ’80s, and ’90s, creates a context that brings added depth and coherence to the artists work, rather than reducing their context. The starting point of the exhibition is the videos, performances, installations and writings of the Indian artist Rummana Hussain. The threads of her work, the questionings and re-workings of notions of personal identity, gender and political realities create resonances and dialectic throughout the exhibition; whether through the embodied works of Ana Mendieta’s sculptures, Adrian Piper’s photographs, the performances of Mona Hatoum, the recreations of personal biography of Helen Chadwick; the complicating of identities and categories of representation in Pushpamala N’s beautiful and witty mock ethnographic photographic series of native women of South India; the more directly political posters, collages and paintings of Lala Rukh and Sheela Gowda; or the recurrent one of archives and text in the book drafts of Rosemarie Trockel or the new ways of navigating narrative and textual form created by Angela Grauerholz. There are also works by Jamelie Hassan, Chohreh Feyzdjou, Shelagh Keeley, and Astrid Klein, but to rush through them here would be to do the show injustice. Its premise, In Order to Join, to create historical discourses of forgotten or neglected histories; to no longer just be talked of, but be part of the talking, the naming, the undoing; and to create new paradigms of connection, of understanding; is present in each of the artists work, and is underscored by the totality, the collective expression, of the exhibition.

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

José Mujica, the President of Uruguay


POLITICS:
José Mujica; Uruguay
My parents’ generation feels like the last to have believed in the integrity, effectiveness and transformative power of politics. With what feels like realism rather than cynicism we seem to have accepted that politicians are interested more in personal glory than collective wellbeing, often dishonest, sometimes greedy, and more and more impotent. But Uruguay’s José Mujica stands out as an example of personal humility, political common sense and humanity, so much that he embodies a forgotten, an almost unbelievable idealism. He lives in his one-bedroom farmhouse and eschews the presidential palace, offering it instead as one of the state shelters for the homeless; drives an old Volkswagen Beetle instead of in a cavalcade; flies economy class rather than by private jet; donates most of his money to social projects; and runs a government that sets prices for essential commodities and provides free computers and education for every child.


MUSIC:
Paapa, Accra, Ghana
Accra is incredibly exciting right now in terms of film, art, poetry, and most especially music. Musicians like Efya, Wanlov & Mensah, Jojo Abot, Kyekyeku, Tawiah, King Ayisoba, Sena Dagadu, and Drunk Beggar Thief are creating work that is original, diverse, and exciting, but my favourite concert of the year was of a young musician called Paapa, launching his conceptual album where Kukua, the main love interest, turns out to be Ghana, so that the lyrics, at first those of love songs, double up to speak to some of our most poignant existential predicaments.

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

Warsan Shire


LITERATURE:
Warsan Shire
The Kenyan-born Somali poet, who this year was named London’s first young poet laureate, and who, with poets like Kate Tempest and Hollie McNish, is awakening a whole new generation to the economy, eloquence, directness and ambit of poetry.

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

Frances Bodomo, Afronauts, to premiere at Sundance Film Festival, 2014


LOOKINGFORWARD TO 2014:
Frances Bodomo, Afronauts
Frances Bodomo’s second film, premiering at Sundance, tells the imagined story of the very real Zambian space program, started by science teacher Edward Makuka Nkoloso and his establishment of the Zambia National Academy of Science, Space and Astronomical Research in an old farmhouse outside Lusaka. Nkloso recruited a 17-year old girl, Matha, and Bodomo in the film looks to tropes such as albinism, the perspectives of exiles and outsiders, and the promises of escape, of space, of another reality.

Highlights 2013 - Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

$
0
0

By Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

Highlights 2013  - Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

Ghalya Saadawi, After The Future Heritage Redux, Materials for a walking tour, 6th edition of the Home Works Forum on Cultural Practices, Beirut, 2013; photograph: © Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

Kaelen Wilson-Goldieis a writer based between Beirut, Lebanon and New York, USA.

I won’t lie to you, 2013 has been hard, and I’m glad to see it end. For whatever reason, it seems as though I’ve spent the past 12 months tugging on two strands of experience – one with art, one with books – trying to braid them around a cruel and unruly cord of current events. At the time of this writing, I’m seven hours behind and nine thousand kilometres away from a city I’ve made my own, Beirut, where another massive car-bomb blast has killed another mid-level politician, but this time in the dead centre of the downtown district, at the height of the morning commute, killing seven, wounding a hundred, and breaking all manner of unspoken rules in the war without end that goes on, undeclared, for years, decades, centuries, what feels like forever. Worn down by proximity to the Syrian civil war, among other things, and willfully dislocated to New York, I’m now distractedly clicking through images on my computer of charred cars, bodies, and buildings. There, running through the centre of one particular picture, is the low-slung wall behind the Starco Center, where, just seven months ago and a world away, the writer and critic Ghalya Saadawi gathered a group of us for a walking tour, titled After the Future: Heritage Redux, which she led several times, mostly at night, during the sixth edition of the Home Works Forum on Cultural Practices, organized by Ashkal Alwan in May.

Saadawi’s tour – with its playful appeals to time travel, storytelling, and blistering political critique, alongside its powerful evocations of anger, melancholy, and imaginative escape – had shaken me deeply. Her work had revived urgent questions about the loss of the city that had all but disappeared from the discourse in Beirut, where it had been said and assumed, for years, that in terms of public space, we had lost, period. And would keep on losing, over and over again, whether to war or political dysfunction or rapacious real-estate development or a disturbingly uneven economy, what difference did it really make. And so I had been writing about this, back and forth, to Saadawi, that occasion for debate and further discussion being the great pleasure, challenge, and solace of this line of work. On the day of the explosion, she wrote: ‘This bomb went off just on the site where we met on those spring nights. It’s eerie. What do we do with all this accumulation?’ Seriously, what do we do? And for how long? And will it ever make any difference? And does it not seem, sometimes, like the saddest thing in the world that we think art – of all things – will not only hold that accumulation together but allow us to sort through and make sense of it all?

Highlights 2013  - Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

Timothy H. O’Sullivan, Pennsylvania Light Artillery, Battery B, Petersburg, Virginia (1864), albumen silver print from glass negative, included in ‘Photography and the American Civil War’, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2013, courtesy: Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1933

The past year of looking at art, whether to avoid or to answer or to think through those questions, was bookended, suitably enough, by two remarkably strong exhibitions exploring the role of photography in times of war. ‘Photography and the American Civil War’, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, was meticulous, erudite, and precise, an education that hummed through at least six different levels of learning (photography as business, journalism, propaganda, history, memorial, fable, and more). ‘WAR/PHOTOGRAPHY: Images of Armed Conflict and Its Aftermath’, at the Brooklyn Museum, was (and through February 2, still is) messy, cluttered, all over the place in too small a space, and intense enough to break your heart (see Tim Hetherington’s video diary) and make you think and send a deep, unsettling wave of nausea through the core of your being. It is also refreshingly international and does not shy away from the complexities of debate, doubt, and anguish that are inevitably raised by a number of iconic images, from Roger Fenton’s cannonballs and Robert Capa’s Fallen Soldier to Spencer Platt’s picture of four young women and one young man, all packed into a Mini Cooper, taking pictures with their mobile phones of the wreckage that surrounds them in the southern suburbs of Beirut after of the war with Israel in 2006. War tourists, callous members of the haut bourgeoisie, concerned citizens, distraught areas residents, indignant activists? The samidoun sticker on the dashboard (Arabic for ‘steadfast’) is something that until this exhibition I’d never noticed before, and I’ve looked at that image a hundred times.

In between those shows, the revolution that began three years ago in Egypt frayed and fell apart, Turkey erupted in euphoric protests but events there have since taken many worrying turns, leftist politicians were picked off one by one in Tunisia, Syria descended into total, unconscionable chaos, Lebanon became totally hopeless, and a civil war in all but name continued to burn through Iraq, a twisted model for the rest of the region. Then, in the space of a single day in Istanbul in September, two very different works in two very different venues (a piece by Dominique Gonzalez-Foerster at collectorspace and a terrific installation by Ruanne Abou-Rahme and Basel Abbas for the Istanbul Biennial) brought me back, curiously, to the heart of Roberto Bolaño’s The Savage Detectives (1998). In that novel, we fall in love with both the figures and the friendship of Arturo Belano and Ulises Lima, poets of the visceral realist school, orphans of an absent avant-garde, who are searching for the lost works of their chosen forebear, Cesárea Tinajero. When they find her poems, they turn out, much to their confusion, bewilderment, and wonder, to be pedagogical drawings: a straight, a wavy line, and a jagged line. They mean nothing, and everything, and in one way or another, they represent the movement of our lives, and the intensities of our experience. With that in mind, the art works that made the greatest impression on me this year were the ones, at it were, that most dramatically bent my line.

John Akomfrah’s The Unfinished Conversation (2012) shown at the 11th Sharjah Biennial traced the history of race, identity, political thought, and cultural production in the late twentieth century through a gorgeous, three-screen video installation on the life and work of Stuart Hall.

Highlights 2013  - Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

Rabih Mroué Riding on a Cloud (2013) performed at Home Works 6, Beirut

Rabih Mroué’s Riding on a Cloud (2013) for Home Works 6, possibly the artist’s best and most emotionally gutting performance to date, delved into the specific story of his brother, Yasser, who was shot in the head shot by a sniper on the day their grandfather was assassinated, and the more general condition of leftist intellectuals and progressive political thinkers being purposefully killed, depriving a country, a society, and a culture of the lungs needed to breathe in new ideas and much needed reforms.

Édouard Manet’s L’Evasion de Rochefort at the Palazzo Ducale was the thing that shocked and haunted my run through the 55th Venice Biennale, and also the thing that struck me as most beautiful and painful of all. Done in the last years of Manet’s life, it is a history painting – depicting a dissident journalist’s dramatic escape from impending incarceration – that consists almost entirely of a churning, blustering sea. Off center, white-capped waves rock through a tiny lifeboat, which is either being pursued or saved by a dark shadow falling across the horizon.

Highlights 2013  - Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

Jean-Luc Moulène Debrayeur (2013), installation view, Beirut Art Center

Jean-Luc Moulène’s Debrayeur anchored a stunning solo show at the Beirut Art Center. Two L-beams – one red, one blue – wrapped around the main exhibition hall and bifurcated the space. Produced in Beirut and commissioned for the exhibition, the steel structures, when viewed from above, formed two rectangles bolted on top of one another but shifted slightly apart. The title, French for ‘disengage’ but also the word for a clutch pedal, was a perfect metaphor for Moulène’s unrivaled practice, as a mechanism controlling how two entities moving at potentially different speeds connect and decouple, if and when needed.

Highlights 2013  - Kaelen Wilson-Goldie

Ruanne Abou-Rahme and Basel Abbas The Incidental Insurgents: The Part About the Bandits (2012-13); courtesy: the artists

Ruanne Abou-Rahme and Basel Abbas’s The Incidental Insurgents: The Part About the Bandits (2012-13), for the 13th Istanbul Biennial, grafted Bolaño’s The Savage Detectives and the writings of Victor Serge (including Memoirs of a Revolutionary) onto the question and condition of Palestine. Staged like an abandoned studio, the installation pulled viewers into a rich, layered world of associations and clues, making us all amateur sleuths in the search for meaning (and the desire for political change).

Jumana Manna’s For Those Who Like the Smell of Burning Tires at the CRG project space in New York made a spry, subtle, sophisticated statement about masculinity and nationalism with three bent flagpoles, each eight meters tall and totally deformed.

Donna Tartt’s The Goldfinch paired with Carel Fabritius’s The Goldfinch at the Frick might have been cleverly cross-promotional but who cares. Tartt’s third novel not only blends the driving, plot-twisting storytelling of Dickens and Tolstoy, it is also a riveting example of ekphrasis in fiction. Moreover, the final chapter reveals itself as the end of long letter, furiously written, desperate, agitated, guts on the table, going for broke to explain how and why an object of art, so dumb and inert by itself, could possibly mean so much to us. I finished the book and I cried for days. I went to see the painting and I was moved, strangely, not so much by how much had been illuminated by the novel but by how differently I saw the work myself. All of Tartt’s conclusions were there – beauty leads to ruin, we are possessed of a heart we cannot trust, life is a disaster, art works speak across time and hold a history of love and ‘the people who have loved beautiful things, and looked out for them, and pulled them from the fire, and sought them when they were lost’. But there’s something else, too. As Arturo Belano and Ulises Lima say after puzzling over Cesárea Tinajero’s poem: ‘It’s a joke, Amadeo. The poem is a joke covering up something more serious.’

Highlights 2013 - Negar Azimi

$
0
0

By Negar Azimi

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Philippe Parreno, The Writer (2007), installation view, 'Anywhere, Anywhere, Out Of The World', Palais de Tokyo, 2013; courtesy: Esther Schipper, Berlin

Negar Azimiis senior editor of Bidoun.

There’s a darkened room deep in the nether regions of Philippe Parreno’s solo appropriation of Paris’s Palais de Tokyo (‘Anywhere, Anywhere, Out of the World’) in which cinema marquee lights of different shapes, sizes, and styles hang – there are 16 of them – flickering on and off and on again (there’s also one outside the entrance to the 1930s art deco building). When it’s in full motion, the motley collection of retired electrical bodies amounts to a strange symphony, like spirits suddenly communicating to us from the dead. The rest of this humongous show – which indulges in the thrilling logic of a children’s hide and seek game – is pretty terrific, too.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Le Corbusier, Marie Cuttoli(detail) (1936), © F.L.C. / Adagp, Paris 2013

Next door at Musée d’Art Moderne is ‘Decorum’, an exhibition of diverse textile work by artists or, as I took to calling it by the third time I saw it, ‘that carpet show’. It turns out that many of the big male guns made work with textiles (Picasso, Brassai), but so, too, did others (Caroline Achaintre, Guidette Carbonell). ‘Decorum’ is generous, warm and playful at moments (take the nice touch of a stray flower by Marc Camille Chaimowicz, who served as the show’s guest artistic director, or a frame lying absently on the floor as if by accident next to a Frances Bacon rug). The exhibition’s straightforwardness without sacrifice to rigour or seriousness was pleasing as it brought renewed vitality and curiosity to an art that is mostly viewed as minor or decorative craft. On occasion, a vernacular and in some cases ancient work from Iran or Morocco or Egypt was thrown in, as the press release stated, ‘to underscore meaningful similarities and differences’. I like that: no pointless intellectual acrobatics to make sense of the question of multiple modernities or indulge in the familiar game of ‘is it craft or art?’ Simply put, there are similarities and there are differences. Enjoy. All of it makes you want to curl up and take a nap.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

František Kupka, The First Step (1910–13), included in ‘Trisha Donnelly: Artist’s Choice’, MoMA, New York, 2013; courtesy: Hillman Periodicals Fund

A disclosure: I love everything Trisha Donnelly breathes life into. Enigmatic without being obfuscatory, vividly personal without being opaque, her works operate their magic on all your senses care of multiple registers. Giving her the keys to the store room of New York’s Museum of Modern Art as the tenth artist invited to mount an exhibition in the museum’s bounds was an inspired decision. Witness finely detailed bird photography, a shiny black pyramid fashioned from plastic, stairs that lead … nowhere, computer generated paintings commissioned by a CEO at Hewlett Packard that approximate astrological charts or colourful South American textiles. This accumulation of mostly long-unseen and in some cases never-seen work spread across three rooms wasn’t at all about that (tired) rubric of outsider art, but rather, about art that engages the eye and the ear in new and unexpected ways as a voyage to outer space would. And it had Trisha’s weird and wonderful fingerprints all over it.

A hip-hop track beckons you into Frances Stark’s Bobby Jesus’s Alma Mater b/w Reading the Book of David and/or Paying Attention Is Free (2013) at this year’s Carnegie International. In a video narrative that is at times a pleasingly confusing torrent of words and associations, the artist recounts a dialogue with Bobby Jesus, a young man who lives on what he describes as ‘Planet Hood’. A flood of images – from portraits of rappers to old masters – makes this an unlikely multimedia experience that is at turns angry, urgent, and funny.

Much has been written about Massimiliano Gioni’s noteworthy ‘Encyclopedic Palace’ at the 55th Venice Biennale, but it was the show within the show organized by Cindy Sherman that made for the most unusually cohesive landscape of images. Her personal photo album collection (itself an extraordinary document of so many varieties of spraywork hair!), drawings collected from prison inmates, creepy dolls and additional quirky eclectica provided a privileged window into the artist’s own psyche.

Yto Barrada’s ‘Album: Cinematheque Tangier’ at the Walker Art Center. I didn’t see the show, but I did follow the artist’s progress as she brought together strands of her own work with the life of the 1930s-era Cinematheque she runs in the heart of Tangier. One feeds the other. In the process of watching this sprawling exhibition come to be, I learned about scopitones, juke-box like technologies that like some antique predecessor of the music video once held 16mm films within them. At the Walker, Barrada installed a series of scopitones featuring films made by North African guest workers in the 1950s – moving tales of migration and desire – once installed in the cafes and bars they frequented.

I went to an early tour of the newly reopened former textile factory at 101 Spring Street in New York that served as the home and studio of the late Donald Judd and indulged in his barely visible interventions, oversize kitchenware, the neat children’s quarters and, of course, his mega sparse floor-bed … so minimal, so special, and yes, so male. Herein is a workshop for ideas that would eventually take form elsewhere, not to mention a strangely appealing vision of design and domesticity.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Mitra Farahani, Fifi Howls from Happiness (2013), film still

Fifi Howls from Happiness directed by Mitra Farahani is a welcome window into the life of an under-recognized artist. Built around the late Bahman Mohasses, one of the enfants terribles of the modern movement in Iran, Farahani’s documentary portrait captures the madness and beauty of the artist’s last moments on earth (literally) in exile in Italy. Deserving of a large-scale appreciation, Mohasses’s crooked painting and sculptural work is macabre and funny at once. The Fifi of the title – a single painterly work that he loved most – was recently on view at New York’s Asia Society’s ‘Iran Modern’ exhibition.

Both Noah Baumbach’s Frances Ha and Rachel Kushner’s The Flamethrowers boasted female protagonists I fell for – fleshy, painfully real, irreverent, foiled. While the former had many filmic moments I delighted in (falling while running is always a gas), the latter held within its bounds a multitude of sentences I smiled at, underlined, and read over and over again. Kushner’s ability to vividly summon up historical scenes as diverse as the narrow New York art world of the 1970s or the radical Italian left of the same period reveals her skill as a gifted ventriloquist.

Hilton Als is simply put one of our best living critics. White Girls, a collection of new and old essays on subjects ranging from Truman Capote to Michael Jackson to Vogue’s Andre Leon Talley meditates mindfully on vexed questions of race, queerness, and longing. It is in turns searing, revelatory, violently true.

An English translation of Albert Cossery’s 1948 Laziness in the Fertile Valley published by the storied New Directions publishing house has odd resonance with the current moment in Egypt where a nation’s debut experiment with democracy has climaxed with a devastating military coup. Like its stylish author, a protagonist flâneur of the cosmopolitan Egyptian surrealist movement who spent most of his life ogling pretty girls, living in the Hotel La Louisiane on Paris’s Left Bank, and, well, being lazy (he wrote a book every decade or so), this story about a family of heroic lay-abouts haunts us with an unlikely imperative: Repose! Repose!

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Mike Kelley, Day is Done (2005-06), film still

Requisite nods: Mike Kelley at PS1. The sensitive installation of Day is Done (2005-06) alone is worth the visit. Camille Henrot’s Grosse Fatigue (2013): poetic rhapsody about the origins of the universe I couldn’t keep my eyes off. The brass band at Jeremy Deller’s after-party at the Venice Biennale (the work was good, too). Meredith Monk’s magical mouth acrobatics in concert in London during the Frieze Art Fair. The pink-legged dog in Pierre Huyghe’s show at the Pompidou (the ultimate artistic quotation from an artist who revels in quotation). The New York Review of Book’s reissue of Renata Adler’s Speed Boat and Pitch Dark represent quirky journalism that is both on and productively off-point. 47 False Starts: Janet Malcolm can walk on water.

Highlights 2013 - Sarah Hromack

$
0
0

By Sarah Hromack

Highlights 2013 - Sarah Hromack

Edward Snowden, 2013

Sarah Hromackis a worker and writer living in Brooklyn, New York. She is the Director of Digital Media at the Whitney Museum of American Art and teaches in New York University’s Steinhardt school.

2013 proved to be an exceptionally interesting year at the intersection of art, media, and technology. A few personal observations from the ground (and the network) here in New York.

Visible Invisibility: Culled from an interview with then-Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald shot in a Hong Kong hotel room by documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras, the now-iconic video still-as-portrait of former CIA employee and NSA contractor Edward Snowden was a defining image of 2013, for me and many, many others. Delivered with a level of rhetorical clarity uncommon to his field, Snowden’s disclosure did more than articulate the reasoning behind his decision to leak documents that continue to reveal the depth and breadth of the National Security Administration’s surveillance programs to various media outlets: His willingness to serve as a visual representation of ‘turnkey tyranny’ added another image – a human face – to a visual lexicon that has emerged in recent years as classified information trickles into public consciousness through various, mostly digital channels. (Private Chelsea Manning’s 2010 disclosure and subsequent distribution, via Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks organization, of the now-infamous Collateral Murder video footage and hundreds of thousands of military documents preceded Snowden, of course. Snowden’s precision of execution, however, is a marker of personal style if there ever was one.)

Not only are the general, mainstream media-consuming public thinking about network security and Internet privacy– these were not topics of everyday conversation a scant four or five years ago – but it also wants to see those concerns embodied in some form. Information isn’t enough to satiate the public imagination in 2013: Photographic proof is required.

Artists, it turns out, hold a particular form of agency here: I was very interested to see Poitras’s ‘9/11 Trilogy’ situated within the context of the 2012 Whitney Biennial, for instance. An image of the National Security Administration’s building, shot from a helicopter flying through restricted air space by artist and geographer Trevor Paglen, graces the December 23, 2013 issue of Time magazine. It is nothing short of stunning. The sublime beauty of Paglen’s images is a clever foil for the deep, dark government operations they often reveal and as such, they are infinitely suited to the Internet, where they now circulate widely to my simultaneous delight and dismay (I first encountered Paglen as an academic geographer in San Francisco and still miss what gets lost in translation when his pretty, pretty pictures go blindly viral).

Highlights 2013 - Sarah Hromack

(Image courtesy: Trevor Paglen)

The Quantified Selfie: Speaking of the social media, the Oxford English Dictionary named ‘selfie’ its International Word of the Year for 2013, defined as ‘a photograph that one has taken of oneself, typically one taken with a smartphone or webcam and uploaded to a social media website.’ People like to take pictures of themselves with famous works of art, not-so-shockingly, a phenomenon that I believe cultural producers– artists and institutions alike – not only actively recognize, but are playing to in ways that range from the mercenary and the circus-like to the potentially critical.

The Jeff Koons face off between New York’s David Zwirner and Gagosian galleries generated an obscene number of selfies shot in the metallic surfaces of Koons’s latest sculptural works. London audiences saw RAndom International’s ‘Rain Room’ debut at the Barbican Centre’s Curve Gallery in 2012; at its MoMA redux, in 2013, the admission queue promised hours-long wait times. The payoff? You guessed it. At the moment, social media channels – Instagram, especially – further attest to New Yorkers’ willingness to queue endlessly for the privilege of photographing themselves reflected in (very, very expensive) mirrored surfaces: entrance lines to Yayoi Kusama’s ‘Infinity Mirrored Room’ at David Zwirner were rumored to be holding at six hours for 45 seconds’ worth of shooting time. A few reading suggestions for those moored outside the galleries: Hito Steyerl’s ‘The Wretched of the Screen’ (e-flux/Sternberg Press, 2012); Paul Chan’s 2010 e-flux essay The Unthinkable Community and Lauren Cornell and Ed Halter’s more recent Mousse essay, Mass Effect, are worth a go. Gallery going selfie-takers might consider posting their mugs to DIS Magazine’s #Artselfie project, which is still going strong.

Massive Attack vs. Adam Curtis also enjoyed its U.S. debut at the Park Avenue Armory in late September. While reviews were mixed (in my cohort of Curtis devotees and Massive Attack/Cocteau Twins holdovers, at least) it was very refreshing to see the cheerful perfection of New Yorkers’ Instagram feeds blindsided by dystopic historical revisionism in the form of full-on propagandist performance spectacle. I could just feel Edward Bernays smiling down upon us all.

Highlights 2013 - Sarah Hromack

Enter the Glassholes: Google Glass hasn’t quite reached the consumer market yet, but 2013 was a year of chance sightings on the nerdy little heads of Google ‘Glass Ambassadors’ the world over: All professional encounters aside, I spotted a young man having what appeared to be a psychedelic experience with a flower while wearing Glass on a sunny day in Madison Square Park; a school of Glass-clad Googlers greeted me in at San Francisco International Airport and seemed to follow me throughout the city on a weekend trip to visit old friends; a kilted man in plastic clogs stared at me very, very intently through Glass while ambling through the New York Art Book Fair. I glared back at him, as if my pointed scowl could disable his new toy. Each encounter prompted a reaction of simultaneous curiosity and abject horror at the thought of being recorded without my consent, as if the physical presence of the apparatus somehow rendered it more nefarious than less-visible forms of surveillance that have been documenting my workaday existence for years.

Shot outside Lubbock, Texas in 112-degree heat against the backdrop of architect Robert Bruno’s Steel House, which looms over Ransom Canyon, photographer Steven Klein’s Google Glass and a Futuristic Vision of Fashion shoot for the September issue of American Vogue captured my personal sense of ambivalence perfectly in a series of dystopic images whose colour saturation and spatial orientation could have been directed by Alfred Hitchcock himself.

Highlights 2013 - Sarah Hromack

Steven Klein, ‘Google Glass and a Futuristic Vision of Fashion’, 2013

Interface Affect: In recent years, I have found it particularly curious to watch some of strongest, most invested relationships between art and technology develop at the places where both intersect with commerce—and ironically so at that, given the art world’s ever-awkward relationship with digital-born art works (and social media, for that matter). Clearly having learned from the unmitigated failure that was the 2011 VIP Art Fair, Christie’s, Artsy, Paddle 8, Artspace, Saatchi, and a host of smaller start-up outfits are working to develop inventive digital experiences that educate, inform, delight – and end in sales. Paddles On! an auction of ‘net art hosted by Phillips and Tumblr sought to establish a market for digital-born works once and for all – a complicated, yet attention-worthy endeavour.

On the Ground in 2014: Looking ahead, I’ll be watching the New Museum’s Incubator for Art, Technology, and Design here in New York, a project opening in the museum’s adjacent building on the Bowery that will undoubtedly impact the city’s burgeoning technology community in many ways. In Brooklyn – and specifically in and around the Greenpoint neighborhood, where I live – I’m eagerly testing Triple Canopy’s new, open-source publishing platform, Alongslide. The ‘real life’ relationship between art and technology only becomes more so in this city as spaces such as 319 Scholes, Transfer Gallery, Babycastles, and countless one-off events tie people, art, and technology together. Remember: One begets the others.

Highlights 2013 - Negar Azimi

$
0
0

By Negar Azimi

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Philippe Parreno, The Writer (2007), installation view, 'Anywhere, Anywhere, Out Of The World', Palais de Tokyo, 2013; courtesy: Esther Schipper, Berlin

Negar Azimiis senior editor of Bidoun.

There’s a darkened room deep in the nether regions of Philippe Parreno’s solo appropriation of Paris’s Palais de Tokyo (‘Anywhere, Anywhere, Out of the World’) in which cinema marquee lights of different shapes, sizes, and styles hang – there are 16 of them – flickering on and off and on again (there’s also one outside the entrance to the 1930s art deco building). When it’s in full motion, the motley collection of retired electrical bodies amounts to a strange symphony, like spirits suddenly communicating to us from the dead. The rest of this humongous show – which indulges in the thrilling logic of a children’s hide and seek game – is pretty terrific, too.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Le Corbusier, Marie Cuttoli(detail) (1936), © F.L.C. / Adagp, Paris 2013

Next door at Musée d’Art Moderne is ‘Decorum’, an exhibition of diverse textile work by artists or, as I took to calling it by the third time I saw it, ‘that carpet show’. It turns out that many of the big male guns made work with textiles (Picasso, Brassai), but so, too, did others (Caroline Achaintre, Guidette Carbonell). ‘Decorum’ is generous, warm and playful at moments (take the nice touch of a stray flower by Marc Camille Chaimowicz, who served as the show’s guest artistic director, or a frame lying absently on the floor as if by accident next to a Frances Bacon rug). The exhibition’s straightforwardness without sacrifice to rigour or seriousness was pleasing as it brought renewed vitality and curiosity to an art that is mostly viewed as minor or decorative craft. On occasion, a vernacular and in some cases ancient work from Iran or Morocco or Egypt was thrown in, as the press release stated, ‘to underscore meaningful similarities and differences’. I like that: no pointless intellectual acrobatics to make sense of the question of multiple modernities or indulge in the familiar game of ‘is it craft or art?’ Simply put, there are similarities and there are differences. Enjoy. All of it makes you want to curl up and take a nap.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

František Kupka, The First Step (1910–13), included in ‘Trisha Donnelly: Artist’s Choice’, MoMA, New York, 2013; courtesy: Hillman Periodicals Fund

A disclosure: I love everything Trisha Donnelly breathes life into. Enigmatic without being obfuscatory, vividly personal without being opaque, her works operate their magic on all your senses care of multiple registers. Giving her the keys to the store room of New York’s Museum of Modern Art as the tenth artist invited to mount an exhibition in the museum’s bounds was an inspired decision. Witness finely detailed bird photography, a shiny black pyramid fashioned from plastic, stairs that lead … nowhere, computer generated paintings commissioned by a CEO at Hewlett Packard that approximate astrological charts or colourful South American textiles. This accumulation of mostly long-unseen and in some cases never-seen work spread across three rooms wasn’t at all about that (tired) rubric of outsider art, but rather, about art that engages the eye and the ear in new and unexpected ways as a voyage to outer space would. And it had Trisha’s weird and wonderful fingerprints all over it.

A hip-hop track beckons you into Frances Stark’s Bobby Jesus’s Alma Mater b/w Reading the Book of David and/or Paying Attention Is Free (2013) at this year’s Carnegie International. In a video narrative that is at times a pleasingly confusing torrent of words and associations, the artist recounts a dialogue with Bobby Jesus, a young man who lives on what he describes as ‘Planet Hood’. A flood of images – from portraits of rappers to old masters – makes this an unlikely multimedia experience that is at turns angry, urgent, and funny.

Much has been written about Massimiliano Gioni’s noteworthy ‘Encyclopedic Palace’ at the 55th Venice Biennale, but it was the show within the show organized by Cindy Sherman that made for the most unusually cohesive landscape of images. Her personal photo album collection (itself an extraordinary document of so many varieties of spraywork hair!), drawings collected from prison inmates, creepy dolls and additional quirky eclectica provided a privileged window into the artist’s own psyche.

Yto Barrada’s ‘Album: Cinematheque Tangier’ at the Walker Art Center. I didn’t see the show, but I did follow the artist’s progress as she brought together strands of her own work with the life of the 1930s-era Cinematheque she runs in the heart of Tangier. One feeds the other. In the process of watching this sprawling exhibition come to be, I learned about scopitones, juke-box like technologies that like some antique predecessor of the music video once held 16mm films within them. At the Walker, Barrada installed a series of scopitones featuring films made by North African guest workers in the 1950s – moving tales of migration and desire – once installed in the cafes and bars they frequented.

I went to an early tour of the newly reopened former textile factory at 101 Spring Street in New York that served as the home and studio of the late Donald Judd and indulged in his barely visible interventions, oversize kitchenware, the neat children’s quarters and, of course, his mega sparse floor-bed … so minimal, so special, and yes, so male. Herein is a workshop for ideas that would eventually take form elsewhere, not to mention a strangely appealing vision of design and domesticity.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Mitra Farahani, Fifi Howls from Happiness (2013), film still

Fifi Howls from Happiness directed by Mitra Farahani is a welcome window into the life of an under-recognized artist. Built around the late Bahman Mohasses, one of the enfants terribles of the modern movement in Iran, Farahani’s documentary portrait captures the madness and beauty of the artist’s last moments on earth (literally) in exile in Italy. Deserving of a large-scale appreciation, Mohasses’s crooked painting and sculptural work is macabre and funny at once. The Fifi of the title – a single painterly work that he loved most – was recently on view at New York’s Asia Society’s ‘Iran Modern’ exhibition.

Both Noah Baumbach’s Frances Ha and Rachel Kushner’s The Flamethrowers boasted female protagonists I fell for – fleshy, painfully real, irreverent, foiled. While the former had many filmic moments I delighted in (falling while running is always a gas), the latter held within its bounds a multitude of sentences I smiled at, underlined, and read over and over again. Kushner’s ability to vividly summon up historical scenes as diverse as the narrow New York art world of the 1970s or the radical Italian left of the same period reveals her skill as a gifted ventriloquist.

Hilton Als is simply put one of our best living critics. White Girls, a collection of new and old essays on subjects ranging from Truman Capote to Michael Jackson to Vogue’s Andre Leon Talley meditates mindfully on vexed questions of race, queerness, and longing. It is in turns searing, revelatory, violently true.

An English translation of Albert Cossery’s 1948 Laziness in the Fertile Valley published by the storied New Directions publishing house has odd resonance with the current moment in Egypt where a nation’s debut experiment with democracy has climaxed with a devastating military coup. Like its stylish author, a protagonist flâneur of the cosmopolitan Egyptian surrealist movement who spent most of his life ogling pretty girls, living in the Hotel La Louisiane on Paris’s Left Bank, and, well, being lazy (he wrote a book every decade or so), this story about a family of heroic lay-abouts haunts us with an unlikely imperative: Repose! Repose!

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Mike Kelley, Day is Done (2005-06), film still

Requisite nods: Mike Kelley at PS1. The sensitive installation of Day is Done (2005-06) alone is worth the visit. Camille Henrot’s Grosse Fatigue (2013): poetic rhapsody about the origins of the universe I couldn’t keep my eyes off. The brass band at Jeremy Deller’s after-party at the Venice Biennale (the work was good, too). Meredith Monk’s magical mouth acrobatics in concert in London during the Frieze Art Fair. The pink-legged dog in Pierre Huyghe’s show at the Pompidou (the ultimate artistic quotation from an artist who revels in quotation). The New York Review of Book’s reissue of Renata Adler’s Speedboat and Pitch Dark represent quirky journalism that is both on and productively off-point. 47 False Starts: Janet Malcolm can walk on water.

Highlights 2013 - Jennifer Higgie

$
0
0

By Jennifer Higgie

Highlights 2013 - Jennifer Higgie

'Hilma af Klint - A Pioneer of Abstraction', installation view Moderna Museet, Stockholm, 2013

Jennifer Higgieis co-editor of frieze and lives in London, UK.

As someone whose name I can’t recall once said: ‘our days are long but life is short’. Thinking back over the past year it occurs to me: how is it possible that 12 months ago was so recent? And so far, far away? Memory, as we know, is no friend to reason: it leaps about, cares not a whit for convention, is a cruel editor and disobedient to boot. So, please bear with me as I attempt to recall what impressed me this past year: I am dabbling in an imprecise science.

At the beginning of the year I crunched through the snow to Stockholm’s Moderna Museet, entered the doors and was staggered by what I saw: a series of enormous, seemingly abstract paintings on paper from 1907 by the Swedish artist Hilma af Klint. I spent the next few hours in a giddy state: wandering from picture to picture. It was like travelling through the various stages of someone’s mind, and seeing the strange and lovely evidence of how the things that this mind had experienced were translated into images – and what images! With more than 200 works on view, they veer from ecstatic abstraction to a woozy, ür-hippy love fest; from a hard-edged minimalism to images of swans and nudes born of what can only be described as a spirit/nature-delirium. And that’s putting it mildly. In 1970 Pontus Hultén, then Director of the Moderna Museet, was offered the entire Af Klint estate, for free. He turned it down, apparently dismissive of her work as the daubings of a spiritualist. (Unlike Kandisky or Mondrian, say.) Kudos to Daniel Birnbaum, the Moderna Museet’s Director, for staging this show, and to its curator, Iris Müller-Westermann, for her excellent scholarship. No work by Af Klint has ever been sold, begging the question: is her omission from the history books something to do with her absence from the market? And while we’re at it: what does her gender have to do with the patronizing response to her spirituality, and by association, the perceived seriousness of her oeuvre?

Highlights 2013 - Jennifer Higgie

Donna Huddleston, ‘Witch Dance’ (2013), performance documentation, Drawing Room, London

I had first heard of Af Klint from my friends Frank Hannon and Donna Huddleston when, in 2005, they staged a show titled ‘Dear Hilma’ – a wondrous homage to the Swedish artist that evoked something of their precursor’s spirit – in a series of charmingly run-down rooms in London’s Fitzrovia. Considering Af Klint’s resurrection, it was apt that in 2013 Donna’s extraordinary new performance, ‘Witch Dance’– her tribute to the expressionist choreographer Mary Wigman – was staged at London’s Drawing Room in September: it ran for half an hour and included otherworldly dancers, an enormous verdant wall painting, ghosts, fog, smashed vases, a J.G. Ballard lookalike sitting on a rock, and three original compositions for the triangle. (In the interests of disclosure, I must confess that one of the triangle compositions was by me, but it only went for five minutes, and another was by my co-editor Dan Fox: however, the performance was so great, I couldn’t bear not to include it on my list – it’s omission because of our involvement would, quite simply, be wrong.)

In February I travelled to Sharjah for the 11th edition of the biennale. It was an important trip for me: the city is fascinating, the hospitality fantastic, and the show, curated by Yuko Hasegawa, included a lot of a great work – too much to mention here, but in particular, the films of Amar Kanwar, the collective CAMP, and John Akomfrah. All were perfect examples of what can happen when politics intertwine, often deliriously, with the imagination – and yet the experience made me question the role that contemporary art plays in countries that implement many laws I fundamentally oppose. To discuss.

Highlights 2013 - Jennifer Higgie

Édouard Manet, Lady with Fans (Portrait of Nina de Callias) (1873), oil on canvas; courtesy: Musée d’Orsay, Paris, Bequest of M. and Mme Ernest Rouart

In May I travelled to New York; three shows in particular have stayed with me: the first was ‘Artist Choice: Trisha Donnelly’ at MoMA: two room of incredible diagrams, paintings and sculptures, all linked by something beyond logic – or, perhaps more precisely, linked by the powerful illogic of an intellect inseparable from an imagination that doesn’t feel the need to justify its rationale. To my mind, this is what art does best: allowing anyone the freedom to wonder and wander. My only complaint is the crowds at MoMA. What’s going on? So many rooms full of jaw-dropping work, but I was forced to flee. Great art can’t do its thing in the middle of a human traffic grid. So, I hot-footed it to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. And my goodness: ‘Impression, Fashion and Modernity’ was one of the shows in 2013 that I never wanted to leave. What could be better than a whip-smart display of incredible paintings, alongside the clothes that feature in said paintings? I had never before thought much about the representation, say, of late-19th century radical fabric design in modern paintings, or what a corset (or the absence, thereof) might signify in a portrait, or what the rakish angle of a bonnet might say about the relationship between artist and sitter. As The Great God Manet declared: ‘The latest fashion is absolutely necessary for a painting. It’s what matters most.’ Who woulda thought! Clothes, it must be said, once again, maketh the man. And in this case, the lady, the child and the lap dog. And I’m not being flippant.

A sobering but no less extraordinary show was to be found in the same museum, ‘Photography and the American Civil War’. For all its scholarship, it reiterated a simple, and very contemporary truth: what a great and terrible flattener war is and how photography, for all of its flaws, rams its tragic democracy home. So what if it’s 150 years ago, the scared eyes of a young solider are as alive as any today; and yes, that blank horror of mass death on a battleground – all of those men, all of those horses – it was real, it is real. Plus ça change.

OK, I must speed up. I’m not writing a novel here! (Unusual for an art writer!) Obviously, 2013 was the year of Massimiliano Gioni’s Venice Biennale, and, unoriginally, I’m a big fan. I loved his show: I loved its surprises, juxtapositions, enthusiasm, spurning of categories, and sheer generosity. And I loved how much work in it I loved. I’m not going to list it all here: it would take too damn long and I don’t want your eyes to glaze over.

Highlights 2013 - Jennifer Higgie

Maria Hassabi, ‘Intermission’, installation view, Lithuania/Cyprus Pavilion, 55th Venice Biennale, 2013

In terms of the pavilions (in no particular order) that jolted me out of my Stendhal syndrome: Jeremy Deller’s British Pavilion refused to shy away from what it means to come from somewhere, took the bulls by their horns (eg, William Morris, war mongers and Russian Oligarchs) and proceeded to alternatively pay homage or poke sticks at them in a smart, savage, funny way (please excuse this mixing of metaphors: it’s what Jeremy did, sort of, and it worked); Bedwyr Williams’s nutty, rather marvellous Wales Pavilion was a joy; the great Zanele Muholi’s portraits in the South African Pavilion deserve the acclaim they are finally receiving; the enormous scale and wondrous lunacy of the Lithuanian/Cyprus (what a fantastically weird pairing!) pavilion’s group show was totally brilliant; the deadpan ‘An Immaterial History of the Venice Biennale’ at the Romanian Pavilion– organized by Alexandra Pirici and Manuel Pelmuş – was ridiculous and profound (trying to remember the past year, let alone the history of the Venice Biennale – I feel their pain); and the Iraq Pavilion: a celebration of life and creativity in a tragic context was humbling and inspiring.

And while we’re in Italy, I must mention Manet for the second time: oh goodness, that show: ‘Manet: Return to Venice’, at the Palazzo Ducale. The hanging of work by the great artist next to paintings by artists who influenced him, for example Titian – it was almost too much. Big thoughts – e.g. ‘ah, so this is how he worked through his influences to reflect upon his own time, and this is what he borrowed from the 16th century’ etc. – were balanced with a startled ‘oh lord, look what he’s done with an asparagus / a handkerchief / a cloud / a wave / a smiling eye / a tubercular cheek …’ etc. What one man could do with a few tubes of paint and a canvas! Dizzying and dazzling.

Highlights 2013 - Jennifer Higgie

‘Alternative Guide to the Universe’, installation view, Hayward Gallery, London, 2013

Now I’m really running out of time, so here’s my short-list: in London, Tate Modern is on a roll. To show Salouda Raouda Choucair, Ibrahim El Salahi, Ellen Gallagher, Paul Klee and Mira Schendel in one year, in separate shows – what an extraordinary achievement for the institution. London’s smaller non-profits continued to do a great job: Chisenhale Gallery always keeps me on my toes and I’m a fan of Studio Voltaire, Camden Art Space, the Showroom, the Serpentine and South London Gallery. The fascinating ‘Alternative Guide to the Universe’ at the Hayward was like a mini-Venice biennale; Sarah Lucas at the Whitechapel was a gas, and ‘Tagore’s Universal Allegories’ at INIVA was a great opportunity to see the fantastic pairing of Anna Boghuigian and Goshka Macuga responding to the legacy of Indian poet and polymath Rabindranath Tagore. Curated by David Campany and Michael Mazière at AmbikaP3, the enormous exhibition of new and old work by Victor Burgin was startling in its contemporary relevance, and I loved Brian Dillon’s show ‘Curiosity’ at Turner Contemporary in Margate – so intriguing to see how one of the best writers around might translate his thinking into objects; Mark Leckey’s ‘The Universal Addressability of Dumb Things’ at the De La Warr Pavilion in Bexhill was a psychedelic romp; and the jewel of show devoted to Marlow Moss at Jerwood Gallery, Hastings was a welcome introduction to this enigmatic artist. In Birmingham, I could have spent hours poring over Lynda Morris’s archive ‘Dear Lynda’ at Eastside Projects and ‘Bob Parks: And the Heavens Cried’ at Union Projects.

Highlights 2013 - Jennifer Higgie

Rohan Wealleans, Fowl Hook 5 (2007); included in ‘Future Primitive’, Heide Museum of Modern Art, Melbourne; courtesy: Heide Museum of Modern Art, Melbourne, and the artist

In Paris, Philippe Parreno’s homage to Stravinsky’s Petruchka was magic on many levels, and Pierre Huyghe at the Pompidou was pretty great too: both artists are relentlessly inventive, surprising and – surprise, surprise! – deeply enamoured of the potential of the visual world, despite their fondness for absence and invisibility. On the other side of the planet, in Melbourne, I loved the blast of fresh air that was ‘Melbourne Now’ at the NGV; ‘Future Primitive’ at Heide Museum of Modern Art and a tremendous Yoko Ono show, ‘War is Over (if you want it)’ at the MCA in Sydney.

Of course, much of my reading of 2013 was by the many excellent writers that frieze is honoured to publish: I humbly salute you all! The prize for favourite book of the year must be divided between Terry Castle’s terrific collection of essays The Professor– I am her new biggest fan; Janet Malcolm’s 41 False Starts, a brilliantly Kafkaesque study of the struggle to write a profile of an artist; Paul Kildea’s magisterial biography, Benjamin Britten, A Life in the 20th Century– a meticulous, page-turning analysis of the evolution of a great composer in the centenary of his birth; and Memoirs of Hadrian, by Marguerite Yourcenar, which was first published in 1951 but is as fresh and as relevant as anything published last week. Although a novel, Memoirs of Hadrian is about history and the individual and how one makes the other (as is Kildea’s book) but that makes it sound boring. It’s not. It’s a wonder.

Like my co-editor, Dan Fox, I must end on a note I wish I didn’t have to. A beautiful man, Ian White, died in late 2013. He was 41. He was an artist, writer (he published in frieze), a teacher, a film programmer, a dry wit and a kind and generous person. It is absurd and tragic he is no longer with us.

What am I looking forward to next year? Same thing I always look forward to: being taken on a journey (there are so many possibilities!).

Highlights 2013 - Brian Dillon

$
0
0

By Brian Dillon

Highlights 2013 - Brian Dillon

Helen Marten, 'Plank Salad', installation view, Chisenhale Gallery, London, 2012–13; courtesy: Chisenhale Gallery; photograph: Andy Keate

Brian Dillonis a writer and critic, and UK editor of Cabinet magazine. He is the curator of the touring show ‘Curiosity: Art and the Pleasures of Knowing’, which tours to Newlyn & The Exchange, Penzance (25 January – 26 April). A collection of his essays, Objects in This Mirror, was published recently by Sternberg Press.

In Brussels towards the end of the year, I wandered unplanned into an early-evening gig by the London jazz quartet Sons of Kemet, whose propulsive but eclectic first album Burn I’d missed when it came out in September. It’s playing now, so you have to imagine my recollections of 2013 clamorously skewed by twin drummers, rambunctious tuba and Shabaka Hutchings’s hectic reeds.

Highlights 2013 - Brian Dillon

Katie Paterson, ‘Second Moon’ (2013-14); courtesy the artist

Last January, I turned up at Chisenhale Gallery for Helen Marten’s ‘Plank Salad’ show with a brief to find one work to write about. In the end I chose Peanuts (2013), a spindly assemblage of wood, metal, foodstuffs and Charlie Brown citations. But it might have been any – or all, given their generously messy relations with each other – of Marten’s scratty, knowing and materially absorbing sculptures. Katie Paterson’s exhibition at the Mead Gallery, Warwick, in the summer, was a reminder of the expansive curiosity of her recent work; and her Second Moon, for which she has dispatched a fragment of the moon around the earth by courier – it’s a little north of LA as I write, so the free tracking app says – is a neat précis of her cosmicomical ambitions. Gerard Byrne’s film A man and a woman make love, part of his Whitechapel Gallery show in January, pursued his long-term engagement with written and oral source material: this time, the Paris Surrealists’ conversations on sex and sexuality. Tacita Dean’s JG, at Frith Street in September, was a ravishing addition to that strain of her work where Smithson and Ballard meet.

Highlights 2013 - Brian Dillon

Tacita Dean, JG (2013), film still

I cried four times in museums last year. Three times at the V&A’s ‘David Bowie Is’, where grainy excerpts of TV performances I was too young to have seen first time seemed to pull me into the odd timescale of early-adolescent, already retrospective discovery. David Bowie invented me, and he may have invented you too. But he has always had a relationship with nostalgia, his own and ours, and this year he messed comprehensively with our sense of time. I welled up again at the Pompidou, in front of photographs of Eileen Gray’s apartment on rue Bonaparte in Paris, where towards the end of her life she still lived surrounded by austere chromed artefacts from her E1027 house in the south of France: a time capsule still speeding into the future. The Pompidou exhibition, which travelled in the autumn to the Irish Museum of Modern Art, was a teeming reminder of the way Gray spanned the best part of a century: from Art Nouveau lacquer screens, to experiments with Perspex in the 1970s.

Highlights 2013 - Brian Dillon

Gerard Byrne, A man and a woman make love (2012), film still

I’ve left all those fat novels of 2013 for my holiday reading, so my books of the year are mostly svelte essays or collections of same. Joshua Cohen’s Attention! A Very Short History is a madly vagrant disquisition on a frequently botched theme: the fate of concentration and reflection in an era of constant distraction – we have never lived otherwise, says Cohen. Wayne Koestenbaum’s My 1980s and Other Essays is a giddy and gorgeous collection of writings on poetry, music and art. Koestenbaum is a great anatomizer of his own hysterical love for other writers: Frank O’Hara, Elizabeth Hardwick, Susan Sontag. Speaking of Sontag: the publication of Jonathan Cott’s Complete Rolling Stone Interview, conducted in 1978, has really vexed some dullard broadsheet reviewers, who are maundering on yet again about her ‘narcissism’. Having fallen out of love myself with Sontag’s later writings, I find I want to defend her seriousness and her style again, so I’m looking forward to Jerome Boyd Maunsell’s short biography of her in the spring. Also coming soon: a new short story collection from Lydia Davis, Can’t and Won’t; Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings’s Walter Benjamin: A Critical Life; and a new edition of William H. Gass’s luminous 1976 essay On Being Blue– Gass’s Middle C was among 2013’s best novels, and may well be his last.

My belatedly discovered book of 2013 though was Cyril Connolly’s The Unquiet Grave: a miserably funny, self-mocking essay written in 1944 under the pseudonym Palinurus. Connolly, who’s half-forgotten now, or remembered mostly as a Grub Street ‘character’ rather than a writer, was a fearsomely productive literary critic who nonetheless considered himself an abject failure. The Unquiet Grave is the book where he famously aphorises: ‘Imprisoned in every fat man a thin one is wildly signalling to be let out.’ But alongside the jokes there’s a genuinely philosophical despair: he’s like a plump, tweedy Cioran or an old-Etonian Pessoa.

Teaching (at the Royal College of Art) has been a joy again this year, but not an unselfish one. I may as well hand my social and cultural diary over to my students for 2014, because this year they delivered two of 2013’s most thrilling events: Travis Jeppesen’s symposium on the work of writer Chris Kraus in March – at which Kraus herself was a gracious and provocative presence – and Natalie Ferris’s conference, in April, on the work of experimental novelist and critic Christine Brooke-Rose. (Ali Smith’s heart-stopping lecture-tribute was a highlight of the latter.) There is more to come this year, and I can only watch and learn.

Highlights 2013 – Tom Morton

$
0
0

By Tom Morton

Highlights 2013 – Tom Morton

'The System of Objects', installation view, DESTE Foundation, Athens, 2013

Tom Mortonis a writer, curator, and contributing editor of frieze, based in London. His recent exhibitions include ‘British British Polish Polish: Art from Europe’s Edges in the Long ‘90s and Today’ at The CSW Ujazdowski Castle, Warsaw, and ‘It Means It Means! - A Drawn Exhibition by Charles Avery & Tom Morton’ at Pilar Corrias, London.

EXHIBITIONS
Writing in a London lashed by winter storms, the opening of Massimiliano Gioni’s 55th Venice Biennale feels very long ago and far away, but it remains memorable as the best reckoning with that ageing, impossible beast since Francesco Bonami played lion tamer in 2003. If Gioni’s exhibition took the ‘Encyclopedic Palace’ as its presiding metaphor, then Andreas Angelidakis and Maria Cristina Didero’s ‘The System of Objects’ at the DESTE Foundation, Athens, was a show as wiki, or even as Tumblr (my full review will appear in the March 2014 edition of frieze, but in short, this was curating that was at once intelligent, risky, playful and frequently astonishing). Also in Athens, Alex Dordoy’s sculptures-cum-digital-prints impressed in a Modern Institute offsite project as part of ReMap 4, as did Blind Adam’s knotty threadwork at The Breeder, while in Turin Peter Friedl’s show ‘Dénouement’ at Guido Costa Projects explored the notion of narrative untying to intriguing, and deeply creepy, effect. In Marfa, Texas, the prospect of Rashid Johnson’s solo at the Ballroom (with its great arcing crop sprayer dripping shea butter) persuaded me to take time out from contemplating the town’s Donald Judds and desert skies, while in New York Cyprien Gaillard’s MoMA retrospective was a reminder of just how consummate his work is in advance of his high-wire, counterintuitive, but weirdly successful pairing with Morris Louis at Sprüth Magers, London, later in 2013. Can I mention something that I was involved in, if only in a single-track-on-a-playlist sense? Organised by Palais de Tokyo, ‘Nouvelles Vagues’ was a season of 53 shows at the Palais and across many of Paris’ commercial galleries that put the emphasis (hush your groans now) on the curator. Of those I caught in between installing my own corner of this project at Emmanuel Perrotin, I particularly enjoyed Adnan Yildiz’s ‘A History of Inspiration’, Sinziana Ravini’s ‘The Black Moon’, and Shanay Jhaveri’s ‘Companionable Silences’ (all at the Palais) and Florence Ostende’s solo show of Alice De Mont at Galerie Dohyang Lee.

Highlights 2013 – Tom Morton

Joseph Beuys, Wirtschaftswerte (1980), installation view ‘Zero Hours: Art Sheffield 2013’; collection S.M.A.K, Gent; photograph: Dirk Pauwels

Back in Britain, some of my favourite shows took place outside of the capital, among them the criminally under-reported ‘Zero Hours: Art Sheffield 2013’, a Triennial in the South Yorkshire city built not around a curatorial concept but around an artist’s work: Joseph Beuys’ shelves of rotting DDR household goods Wirtschaftswerte (Economic Values, 1980). Not far from Sheffield, the Hepworth Wakefield’s coterminous trio of excellent shows by Dana Schutz, Matthew Darbyshire and Roger Hiorns coincided with the re-installation of Hiorns’ iconic crystallised council flat, Seizure (2008), at the Yorkshire Sculpture Park, a visionary feat overseen by the Arts Council Collection’s former Head (and the Contemporary Art Society’s new Director) Caroline Douglas, which left me itching to see what coup she’ll pull of next. In Norwich, Brian Griffiths’ solo at the Castle Museum, and his show of works selected from the Arts Council Collection ‘Shortcuts and Digressions’ (featuring, among others, Cathy Wilkes, Keith Wilson, and Elizabeth Wright) was a reminder of what an important maker of, and thinker-about, objects he is. Also very much of note in extra-London Britain were Sophie von Hellermann’s solo ‘Elephant in the Room’ at firstsite, Colchester (that record-breaking wall mural!), Mick Peter’s solo ‘Trademark Horizon’ at Glasgow’s SWG3, and the Mark Leckey-curated touring show ‘The Universal Addressibility of Dumb Things’, which I caught at the De La Warr Pavilion, Bexhill on Sea.

Highlights 2013 – Tom Morton

Aaron Angell, Model for gallery peacetime – Boat Burial (2013), installation view, Rob Tufnell, Sunday Art Fair, 2013

Here in the capital, some favourites included Sophie Jung’s breathy, and often very funny iPod-fitted sculptures at Ceri Hand (again, my full review appears in the March 2014 frieze), Eddie Peake’s reimagining of Bethold Lubetkin’s penguin pool at White Cube, Philomene Pirecki’s fugitive images of images at Supplement, Aaron Angell’s aquarium for axolotls at Rob Tufnell’s Sunday Art Fair stand, Daniel Silver’s archaeological excavation-cum-monument-to-Freud for Artangel, Lutz Bacher’s show at the ICA (specifically the marvellous lower room), Sarah Lucas’ Whitechapel retrospective, Alessandro Rabottini’s John Armleder exhibition at the Dairy Arts Centre, Andy Holden at 176, and the Jess Flood-Paddock-curated show ‘£5.34’ at Carl Freedman, which featured works by the artist and Rupert Ackroyd, Owen Bullett, Nathaniel Cary, Nicolas Deshayes, Florian Roithmayr, and Fergal Stapleton, and had the best invitation card (an image of an iPhone dunked in a Sports Direct mug to make an adhoc speaker) of the year. I was also much taken with Tate Britain’s austerely, even monkishly staged show ‘Painting Now: Five Contemporary Artists’, which featured works by Tomma Abts, Gillian Carnegie, Simon Ling, Lucy McKenzie, and the fantastic Catherine Story.

Highlights 2013 – Tom Morton

Karl Ove Knausgaard, My Struggle: Book Two, A Man in Love, 2013; photograph: Jessica Lin


BOOKS
Can any contemporary literary experience compare to Karl Ove Knausgaard’s extraordinary autobiographical project Min Kimp (My Struggle)? The translation of its six volumes, published in Norway between 2009–11, is proceeding at a stately pace, but the release of the English edition of the second volume, A Man in Love, made me glad to be a reader in 2013. Adam Thirlwell’s fascinating and playful project Multiples– for which 12 stories in 18 languages were translated, and re-translated, by 61 authors including Laurent Binet, Gary Shteyngart and Zadie Smith with wildly varying degrees of stylistic license – proved to be perfect dish at which to peck between meals, while Tao Lin’s much-trumpeted novel Taipei featured some of the most delicious passages I’ve read this year, although they were sandwiched between a great deal of nutrient-free hipster waffle. Of the two Dave Eggers novels published in the UK in 2013, A Hologram for the King had the edge over The Circle (did somebody say Microserfs?), while George Saunders’ latest collection of short stories, Tenth of September, saw the American writer shift into a darkly brilliant new gear. Special mention should also be made of Mark Fisher’s essay – published originally on www.thenorthstar.info but circulated through umpteen social media platforms – ‘Exiting the Vampire Castle’. Required reading, especially in an art world that often prefers its progressive politics without any inconvenient reference to class.

Highlights 2013 – Tom Morton

Declan Lowney, Alan Partridge: Alpha Papa, 2013, film still


TV & FILM
The first cinematic outing of Norfolk’s King of Sports Casual in Alan Partridge: Alpha Papa was always going to be my must-see-even-through-splayed-fingers film of 2013. Despite my fears, the treasured radio and TV character’s transition to the big screen was a triumph. As Alan would have it, ‘Back of the Net!’. On television – or rather on various streaming services – the excellent comedies Him & Her, PhoneShop and Arrested Development returned for fresh seasons, as did the ludicrous, and ludicrously fun Game of Thrones. I am currently badgering friends and family to catch up with Netflix’s prison drama Orange is the New Black.


MUSIC
Ten tracks that have kept me company in 2013: Bill Callahan, Small Plane; FKA Twigs, Water Me; Disclosure, White Noise; Lorde, Royals; Vampire Weekend, Step; Kanye West, Black Skinhead; Autre Ne Veut, Play by Play; Chance the Rapper, Juice; Kingdom Feat. Kelela, Bank Head; Rhye, Open.

Highlights 2013 – Tom Morton

Robert Overby, Pop Top, 1987


LOOKINGFORWARD
The Glasgow International (especially Simon Martin), Robert Overby at the Centre d’Art Contemporain Genève, Ed Atkins at the Serpentine, Fatima Hellberg’s programme at Cubitt, Ned Beauman’s forthcoming novel Glow, the ninth and final series of Channel 4’s Peep Show.

Highlights 2013: Aram Moshayedi

$
0
0

By Aram Moshayedi

Highlights 2013: Aram Moshayedi

Ryan Gander, Artists' Cocktails, 2013

Aram Moshayediis a writer and curator at the Hammer Museum, Los Angeles

The exhibition ‘oO’, curated by Raimundas Malasauskas for the Lithuanian and Cypriot Pavilion at the Venice Biennale, seemed to characterize a curatorial mode that was felt throughout the short and hazy year that was 2013. As if possessed by sights and sounds that were indifferent to the spectacle and ceremony that was the standard of the national presentations elsewhere, the repurposed gymnasium where this exhibition was located operated according to its own biological clock.  ‘oO’ was consumed by an ominous audio installation by Norwegian artist Morten Norbye Halvorsen and continuously inhabited by a trio of slow, writhing figures choreographed by New York-based Maria Hassabi, among others. Together, these works formed integral parts of the exhibition’s overall scenography as a living, breathing entity subject to change and continuous undoing.

This was where I also had my first encounter with a Roomba; a robotic household floor-cleaner that banged and crashed into the walls of the gym’s under-lit hallways. My meeting with such an odd and reticent character was similar to how it later felt to be in Pierre Huyghe’s retrospective at the Centre Pompidou, where most of the goings-on likewise withheld their secrets and had the majority of visitors wandering about the exhibition as though they were lost, staring into empty corners of the museum or reading didactic panels from the Pompidou’s previous installation of works by the late Mike Kelley (whose death in 2012 continued to be felt throughout the year). On my first visit to the Huyghe exhibition, the Pompidou had run out of exhibition guides, which further underscored a directionless reverie that characterized many of the works included in the dense web of the artist’s 30-year output.

Highlights 2013: Aram Moshayedi

Concert, ‘Behave Like an Audience’ LP cover, 2013

If it wasn’t already the title of a debut album by the band Concert (Martin Norbye Halvorsen, Benjamin Seror, and Chris Evans), released in 2013 by Sternberg Press and organized by curator Mai Abu ElDahab – who, with Anthony Huberman, will co-curate the 2014 Liverpool Biennial – ‘Behave Like an Audience’ might have been an astute reminder for those viewers who made their way into the Huyghe exhibition in droves. One can only hope that they will be as lost when the show makes its way to the Ludwig Museum and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art in 2014.

To ‘behave like an audience’ was something of the past year’s mantra, delivered in a flood of exhibitions that played on varying degrees of inwardness, refusal, and withdrawal from an audience that grew ever more intrigued by and skeptical of an inflated art market. In the company of record auction sales, prospecting art buyers who favoured the sweet, fluffy fleet of generic, assembly-line abstraction and formalist painting seemed to cast a particularly disheartening glow on the year’s end (you’ll find none of those artist’s names or praises here). But despite these trends, an ever-increasing audience, and a flood of ‘venture art lovers,’ there were showings by a handful of artists and curators and writers that proved that there are greater things at stake.

Looking forward to 2014, writer Sarah Lehrer-Graiwer’s forthcoming book on Lee Lozano’s Dropout Piece, as part of Afterall’s ‘One Work’ series, is a testimony to the benefits of working in ways that are understated, if not absent, and better kept as secret. It is likely to be a book with conceptual and methodological ties to Bruce Hainley’s Under the Sign of [sic.]: Sturtevant’s Volte-Face, published in 2013 by Semiotext(e) and the most substantial and reflective/reflexive piece of writing on the great Sturtevant, whose recent foray into visibility from a career of relative under-appreciation will culminate in a survey exhibition at MoMA, New York later this year. Hainley’s coupling of criticism and intimacy makes Under the Sign of [sic.] a model for intimately writing and thinking about the lives of artists and artworks.

Also in 2013, operating as something of an underground outpost for artists, curators, writers, and other participants in the ever-expanding ‘art world,’ Piero Golia’s provisional private club, the Chalet, opened its doors to 40 hand-selected guests one night each week for the last few months of the year. Accessed through an un-disclosable entrance not far from Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions (LACE), the Chalet was christened at almost the very moment LACE announced the sudden departure of executive director Carol Stakenas. With few insights into the hiring process yet to be revealed, the fate of the longstanding non-profit sits in the hands of a perplexing board, who we can only hope in the coming year will find a candidate capable of turning the organization around and retaining some of the glory from its decades-long history. In the meantime, however, the Chalet will continue to operate almost parasitically (and independently funded) for another nine or so months, until the patina of its highly designed interiors wears away and the folklore around its activities concretizes into something seemingly more substantial.

The opening of the Chalet made some long for the earlier era of Jason Rhoades’ epic Black Pussy Soirée Cabaret Macramé and the messy adrenaline rush it embodied. This was particularly true as the late artist’s largest museum exhibition in the United States more-or-less occurred concurrently at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Philadelphia (so many end-of-the-year summaries and best-ofs have made mention of the exhibition ‘Jason Rhoades, Four Roads’ that I can’t imagine adding anything more than my favorable allegiance). Admittedly, I was never able to attend a party at Rhoades’ Black Pussy, though I remember wanting so badly to score an invite. But looking forward into the future, for many of us who showed up too late to Los Angeles, to Rhoades’ party, the Chalet will hopefully have a similar ‘you really had to be there’ thing that participants and on-lookers in the Black Pussy debauchery have continued to relay in its aftermath. For now, however, most of us anticipating what will become of Golia’s project in the months to come.

Highlights 2013: Aram Moshayedi

Miljohn Ruperto and Ulrik Heltoft: ‘Voynich Botanical Studies; Specimen 34v JARO;’ 2013

Of the many other things worth mentioning in 2013 that may or may not have had something to do with the above: Miljohn Ruperto and Ulrik Heltoft’s fantastical photographic approximations of the 15th-century Voynich Manuscript at Thomas Solomon Gallery (looking forward: Ruperto will participate in the 2014 Whitney Biennial and will concurrently have his first solo exhibition in New York at Koenig & Clinton); Ryan Gander’s book of Artists’ Cocktails; the SoundCloud download of MIXTA2E by 18+, whose music video for the song ‘BITCH’ takes the place of an official press release for the Lithuanian and Cypriot Pavilion’s presentation in Venice; the reunion of the rap duo The Bushes (Ry Rocklen and Nick Lowe); King Krule’s sorrowful whaling, moaning, bellyaching on 6 Feet Beneath the Moon (True Panther Sounds); the distorted bass of ‘Cars That Go Boom’ reverberating from Wallspace’s HVAC in Paul Elliman’s first solo exhibition with the gallery in New York; the selection of Haim Steinbach photos from the early 1980s in the artist’s 40-year survey at the Hessel Museum of Art, Bard College; and the Walker Art Center’s unprecedented acquisition of the complete chapters of Allan Sekula’s Fish Story (1989–95) – Sekula’s death in 2013 was one of the year’s greatest losses.

Highlights 2013 - Negar Azimi

$
0
0

By Negar Azimi

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Philippe Parreno, The Writer (2007), installation view, 'Anywhere, Anywhere, Out Of The World', Palais de Tokyo, 2013; courtesy: Esther Schipper, Berlin

Negar Azimiis senior editor of Bidoun.

There’s a darkened room deep in the nether regions of Philippe Parreno’s solo appropriation of Paris’s Palais de Tokyo (‘Anywhere, Anywhere, Out of the World’) in which cinema marquee lights of different shapes, sizes, and styles hang – there are 16 of them – flickering on and off and on again (there’s also one outside the entrance to the 1930s art deco building). When it’s in full motion, the motley collection of retired electrical bodies amounts to a strange symphony, like spirits suddenly communicating to us from the dead. The rest of this humongous show – which indulges in the thrilling logic of a children’s hide and seek game – is pretty terrific, too.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Le Corbusier, Marie Cuttoli(detail) (1936), © F.L.C. / Adagp, Paris 2013

Next door at Musée d’Art Moderne is ‘Decorum’, an exhibition of diverse textile work by artists or, as I took to calling it by the third time I saw it, ‘that carpet show’. It turns out that many of the big male guns made work with textiles (Picasso, Brassai), but so, too, did others (Caroline Achaintre, Guidette Carbonell). ‘Decorum’ is generous, warm and playful at moments (take the nice touch of a stray flower by Marc Camille Chaimowicz, who served as the show’s guest artistic director, or a frame lying absently on the floor as if by accident next to a Frances Bacon rug). The exhibition’s straightforwardness without sacrifice to rigour or seriousness was pleasing as it brought renewed vitality and curiosity to an art that is mostly viewed as minor or decorative craft. On occasion, a vernacular and in some cases ancient work from Iran or Morocco or Egypt was thrown in, as the press release stated, ‘to underscore meaningful similarities and differences’. I like that: no pointless intellectual acrobatics to make sense of the question of multiple modernities or indulge in the familiar game of ‘is it craft or art?’ Simply put, there are similarities and there are differences. Enjoy. All of it makes you want to curl up and take a nap.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

František Kupka, The First Step (1910–13), included in ‘Trisha Donnelly: Artist’s Choice’, MoMA, New York, 2013; courtesy: Hillman Periodicals Fund

A disclosure: I love everything Trisha Donnelly breathes life into. Enigmatic without being obfuscatory, vividly personal without being opaque, her works operate their magic on all your senses care of multiple registers. Giving her the keys to the store room of New York’s Museum of Modern Art as the tenth artist invited to mount an exhibition in the museum’s bounds was an inspired decision. Witness finely detailed bird photography, a shiny black pyramid fashioned from plastic, stairs that lead … nowhere, computer generated paintings commissioned by a CEO at Hewlett Packard that approximate astrological charts or colourful South American textiles. This accumulation of mostly long-unseen and in some cases never-seen work spread across three rooms wasn’t at all about that (tired) rubric of outsider art, but rather, about art that engages the eye and the ear in new and unexpected ways as a voyage to outer space would. And it had Trisha’s weird and wonderful fingerprints all over it.

A hip-hop track beckons you into Frances Stark’s Bobby Jesus’s Alma Mater b/w Reading the Book of David and/or Paying Attention Is Free (2013) at this year’s Carnegie International. In a video narrative that is at times a pleasingly confusing torrent of words and associations, the artist recounts a dialogue with Bobby Jesus, a young man who lives on what he describes as ‘Planet Hood’. A flood of images – from portraits of rappers to old masters – makes this an unlikely multimedia experience that is at turns angry, urgent, and funny.

Much has been written about Massimiliano Gioni’s noteworthy ‘Encyclopedic Palace’ at the 55th Venice Biennale, but it was the show within the show organized by Cindy Sherman that made for the most unusually cohesive landscape of images. Her personal photo album collection (itself an extraordinary document of so many varieties of spraywork hair!), drawings collected from prison inmates, creepy dolls and additional quirky eclectica provided a privileged window into the artist’s own psyche.

Yto Barrada’s ‘Album: Cinematheque Tangier’ at the Walker Art Center. I didn’t see the show, but I did follow the artist’s progress as she brought together strands of her own work with the life of the 1930s-era Cinematheque she runs in the heart of Tangier. One feeds the other. In the process of watching this sprawling exhibition come to be, I learned about scopitones, juke-box like technologies that like some antique predecessor of the music video once held 16mm films within them. At the Walker, Barrada installed a series of scopitones featuring films made by North African guest workers in the 1950s – moving tales of migration and desire – once installed in the cafes and bars they frequented.

I went to an early tour of the newly reopened former textile factory at 101 Spring Street in New York that served as the home and studio of the late Donald Judd and indulged in his barely visible interventions, oversize kitchenware, the neat children’s quarters and, of course, his mega sparse floor-bed … so minimal, so special, and yes, so male. Herein is a workshop for ideas that would eventually take form elsewhere, not to mention a strangely appealing vision of design and domesticity.

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Mitra Farahani, Fifi Howls from Happiness (2013), film still

Fifi Howls from Happiness directed by Mitra Farahani is a welcome window into the life of an under-recognized artist. Built around the late Bahman Mohasses, one of the enfants terribles of the modern movement in Iran, Farahani’s documentary portrait captures the madness and beauty of the artist’s last moments on earth (literally) in exile in Italy. Deserving of a large-scale appreciation, Mohasses’s crooked painting and sculptural work is macabre and funny at once. The Fifi of the title – a single painterly work that he loved most – was recently on view at New York’s Asia Society’s ‘Iran Modern’ exhibition.

Both Noah Baumbach’s Frances Ha and Rachel Kushner’s The Flamethrowers boasted female protagonists I fell for – fleshy, painfully real, irreverent, foiled. While the former had many filmic moments I delighted in (falling while running is always a gas), the latter held within its bounds a multitude of sentences I smiled at, underlined, and read over and over again. Kushner’s ability to vividly summon up historical scenes as diverse as the narrow New York art world of the 1970s or the radical Italian left of the same period reveals her skill as a gifted ventriloquist.

Hilton Als is simply put one of our best living critics. White Girls, a collection of new and old essays on subjects ranging from Truman Capote to Michael Jackson to Vogue’s Andre Leon Talley meditates mindfully on vexed questions of race, queerness, and longing. It is in turns searing, revelatory, violently true.

An English translation of Albert Cossery’s 1948 Laziness in the Fertile Valley published by the storied New Directions publishing house has odd resonance with the current moment in Egypt where a nation’s debut experiment with democracy has climaxed with a devastating military coup. Like its stylish author, a protagonist flâneur of the cosmopolitan Egyptian surrealist movement who spent most of his life ogling pretty girls, living in the Hotel La Louisiane on Paris’s Left Bank, and, well, being lazy (he wrote a book every decade or so), this story about a family of heroic lay-abouts haunts us with an unlikely imperative: Repose! Repose!

Highlights 2013  - Negar Azimi

Mike Kelley, Day is Done (2005-06), film still

Requisite nods: Mike Kelley at PS1. The sensitive installation of Day is Done (2005-06) alone is worth the visit. Camille Henrot’s Grosse Fatigue (2013): poetic rhapsody about the origins of the universe I couldn’t keep my eyes off. The brass band at Jeremy Deller’s after-party at the Venice Biennale (the work was good, too). Meredith Monk’s magical mouth acrobatics in concert in London during the Frieze Art Fair. The pink-legged dog in Pierre Huyghe’s show at the Pompidou (the ultimate artistic quotation from an artist who revels in quotation). The New York Review of Book’s reissue of Renata Adler’s Speedboat and Pitch Dark represent quirky journalism that is both on and productively off-point. Forty-One False Starts: Janet Malcolm can walk on water.

Highlights 2013 - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

$
0
0

By Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

Terrence Malick, To the Wonder (2013), film still

Nana Oforiatta-Ayimis a writer and filmmaker based in Accra, Ghana, where she runs the cultural research platform, ANO.

FILM:
Terrence Malick, To the Wonder
Watching this I sometimes felt as restless as you do on a long train journey when there is nothing but the same expanse of landscape stretching on for miles, your mind still too attuned to what has just been left behind to fully rest in its stillness. There were also moments I felt irritated by the camera’s constant, travelling gaze over Marina, the main female character, by her portrayal as endlessly winsome, lithe, childlike. It made me feel caged in and reminded me of the potential reductiveness of the male lens, especially as the way Malick portrayed the characters seemed somehow archetypal. But as the film progressed the admiration for the beauty of the cinematography and of the film’s rhythm gave way to awe of what Malick was doing. Through the structure, the narrative, the editing, the characters, he had managed to create a kind of cinema of the metaphysical, capturing in just two hours the seeming inescapability of human suffering; the striving for and elusiveness of transcendence and connection; the banality and loneliness of being trapped within our selves; the all-too-brief escape of romantic love; the immanence, despite all this, of beauty. The way he managed to counter conventional characterisation with characters almost devoid of particularities that instead of ending in stereotype, reached towards a universality of experience.

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

‘In Order To Join’, Museum Abteiberg, Mönchengladbach, 2013


ART:
‘In Order To Join’, Museum Abteiberg, Mönchengladbach, Germany
Exhibitions with generalised categories such as ‘India’, ‘Africa’, or ‘Women’ often leave one with the impression that the included artists have been put together to give them some presence within a cultural landscape that does not yet seem to have more nuanced spaces for them. ‘In Order to Join’, a show of women artists born between 1947 and 1957 and specifically of work created in the 1970s, ’80s, and ’90s, curated by Swapnaa Tamhane and Susanne Titz, creates a context that brings added depth and coherence to the artists work, rather than reducing their context. The starting point of the exhibition is the videos, performances, installations and writings of the Indian artist Rummana Hussain. The threads of her work, the questionings and re-workings of notions of personal identity, gender and political realities create resonances and dialectic throughout the exhibition; whether through the embodied works of Ana Mendieta’s sculptures, Adrian Piper’s photographs, the performances of Mona Hatoum, the recreations of personal biography of Helen Chadwick; the complicating of identities and categories of representation in Pushpamala N’s beautiful and witty mock ethnographic photographic series of native women of South India; the more directly political posters, collages and paintings of Lala Rukh and Sheela Gowda; or the recurrent one of archives and text in the book drafts of Rosemarie Trockel or the new ways of navigating narrative and textual form created by Angela Grauerholz. There are also works by Jamelie Hassan, Chohreh Feyzdjou, Shelagh Keeley, and Astrid Klein, but to rush through them here would be to do the show injustice. Its premise, In Order to Join, to create historical discourses of forgotten or neglected histories; to no longer just be talked of, but be part of the talking, the naming, the undoing; and to create new paradigms of connection, of understanding; is present in each of the artists work, and is underscored by the totality, the collective expression, of the exhibition. It runs till 16 March 2014 in Mönchengladbach and 1 November – 14 December 2014 in Mumbai.

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

José Mujica, the President of Uruguay


POLITICS:
José Mujica; Uruguay
My parents’ generation feels like the last to have believed in the integrity, effectiveness and transformative power of politics. With what feels like realism rather than cynicism we seem to have accepted that politicians are interested more in personal glory than collective wellbeing, often dishonest, sometimes greedy, and more and more impotent. But Uruguay’s José Mujica stands out as an example of personal humility, political common sense and humanity, so much that he embodies a forgotten, an almost unbelievable idealism. He lives in his one-bedroom farmhouse and eschews the presidential palace, offering it instead as one of the state shelters for the homeless; drives an old Volkswagen Beetle instead of in a cavalcade; flies economy class rather than by private jet; donates most of his money to social projects; and runs a government that sets prices for essential commodities and provides free computers and education for every child.


MUSIC:
Paapa, Accra, Ghana
Accra is incredibly exciting right now in terms of film, art, poetry, and most especially music. Musicians like Efya, Wanlov & Mensah, Jojo Abot, Kyekyeku, Tawiah, King Ayisoba, Sena Dagadu, and Drunk Beggar Thief are creating work that is original, diverse, and exciting, but my favourite concert of the year was of a young musician called Paapa, launching his conceptual album where Kukua, the main love interest, turns out to be Ghana, so that the lyrics, at first those of love songs, double up to speak to some of our most poignant existential predicaments.

Highlights 2013  - Nana Oforiatta-Ayim

Warsan Shire


LITERATURE:
Warsan Shire
The Kenyan-born Somali poet, who this year was named London’s first young poet laureate, and who, with poets like Kate Tempest and Hollie McNish, is awakening a whole new generation to the economy, eloquence, directness and ambit of poetry.

AFRONAUTSTEASER from Frances Bodomo on Vimeo.

LOOKINGFORWARD TO 2014:
Frances Bodomo, Afronauts
Frances Bodomo’s second film, premiering at Sundance, tells the imagined story of the very real Zambian space program, started by science teacher Edward Makuka Nkoloso and his establishment of the Zambia National Academy of Science, Space and Astronomical Research in an old farmhouse outside Lusaka. Nkloso recruited a 17-year old girl, Matha, and Bodomo in the film looks to tropes such as albinism, the perspectives of exiles and outsiders, and the promises of escape, of space, of another reality.

Learning to Live With MoMA

$
0
0

By Jason Farago

Learning to Live With MoMA

Concept sketch for The Museum of Modern Art. View from 53rd Street. © 2014 Diller Scofidio + Renfro

It’s been a while, here in New York, since we’ve had an urban debacle as angry and as general as the one generated last week by the latest plans for the Museum of Modern Art. Take the disappointment that accompanied the skinning of Edward Durell Stone’s ‘Lollipop Building’ at Columbus Circle last decade, add confusion about the vicissitudes of contemporary art in a moment of financial boom and populist gestures, and stir in the ire at the city’s plutocracy that drove last November’s landslide election of Mayor Bill de Blasio after 12 years under the thumb of Michael Bloomberg. It’s a worrying brew, and that’s before you add in the most loudly bewailed ingredient: the coming destruction of the former home of the American Folk Art Museum, which sits between the current MoMA site and the mammoth 82-story Jean Nouvel tower soon to rise near Sixth Avenue, in which the museum will have a few new galleries.

The new designs, by the firm Diller Scofidio + Renfro, are surprisingly thin. They are not ‘grand’ and ‘ambitious,’ as the New York Times had it, but wishy-washy and incremental. The one clear improvement of the DS+R plan is the opening up of the West 54th Street side of the museum (the back side, currently), ripping down Yoshio Taniguchi’s gray baffles. That will create a new public entrance into the sculpture garden, which excites me, even if I worry about the probable High Line-ization of a currently peaceful space. Other than that, though, the plan is a grim rundown. On the site of the former American Folk Art Museum, which abuts MoMA’s current West 53rd Street entrance, will stand a pair of glass boxes: a three-story ‘art bay,’ which will open onto the street, and a slick ‘gray box’ above it that can function as both gallery and theatre. Both look like Chelsea gallery imports to Midtown, and both are inane, solving for problems MoMA does not have while ignoring the ones it does. (The museum has been notably vague on just what it wants to do with these behemoth chambers. The claim is ‘contemporary art and performance,’ and MoMA’s growing attention to performance has been welcome, even if for every innovator like Boris Charmatz there seems to be a Fischerspooner, who performed there in 2009, long after their early 2000s star had waned. Wheezes like Random International’s ‘Rain Room,’ a frivolous but wildly popular summer confection, also seem likely.) A new glass-fronted gallery on the second floor, above the current bookshop, also seems unworkable – a glorified hallway, more for contemplating traffic than art. Circulation, allegedly harmonized into a ‘loop,’ will surely remain as big a problem as before, at least when the construction is complete in 2018–19. Between now and then it’ll be even messier.

And with the three new galleries in the overblown Nouvel tower, MoMA will pick up just a piddling 39,000 square feet (3,600 square meters) of exhibition space. It’s a negligible, frankly insulting contribution to the display of the permanent collection; it will also do nothing to alleviate the overcrowding that has afflicted the museum since 2004, which is not just an inconvenience but a conservation hazard. The permanent collection, grossly shortchanged in the Taniguchi building, is neglected again in the DS+R plan, neglected by design in favour of the pseudo-egalitarian gigantism seen in museums such as Tate Modern’s Turbine Hall in London to Monumenta in Paris.

Learning to Live With MoMA

Concept design for The Museum of Modern Art. Axonometric plan. © 2014 Diller Scofidio + Renfro

Can MoMA do better? My argument, sorry to say, is that it probably can’t. It’s been bracing to witness the universal outcry following last week’s release of preliminary plans for MoMA’s latest expansion, with anger and despair uniting the worlds of art and architecture and stretching across the political spectrum. Yet the outcry has also been troublingly ahistorical, and I don’t think we can understand just how bad things have got, or how unlikely they are to get better, without looking at how we got here. The whole reason that DS+R have been forced to conceive this unworkable expansion is because MoMA dodged the job in 1997, the last time they embarked on a construction project of this scale. Then they were willing to ask tough questions about the museum’s future – but they balked, wagering incorrectly that all would be resolved through what Herbert Muschamp, the late New York Times architecture critic, once called ‘polite Gilded Age dinner spaces, reclad in the International Style.’ The DS+R plan is a fixer-upper, as well as a reflection of the slow drift in mission MoMA has suffered in the years between the previous renovation and this one.

The last time trustees voted to expand the museum was in 1994, a decade after the opening of Cesar Pelli’s unloved additions. (Pelli, charitably and not without humour, did not much mind. He told an interviewer in 2005 that when MoMA hired him the museum ‘was in a desperate financial situation… Now they have new wealthy patrons, they have the money, they can do it well.’) Critically, the 1990s expansion went hand-in-hand with serious, broad thinking about the future of the museum. MoMA began to consider acquiring more space over on Tenth Avenue to showcase contemporary art, but the curators bridled, on the Alfred Barr-approved grounds that modernism is a continuous phenomenon and contemporary art had to be seen in the context of the big boys upstairs. They considered, too – as was reported in a 2001 New Yorker profile of the museum’s then chief curator of painting and sculpture, Kirk Varnedoe – whether MoMA should stop collecting art after 2000 and become the definitive museum of art of the last century: MoMA as the new Musée d’Orsay! (Those keen on further study should try to find a copy of the now out-of-print Imagining the Future of the Museum of Modern Art, published by MoMA in 1998.) Instead the museum retained its commitment to contemporary art, and actually insisted that the architects being considered for the next expansion give primacy to contemporary display.

And so came the charrette (the design development phase), one of the most infuriating episodes in the recent cultural life of this city. According to a 2004 article in New York magazine, in 1996 a phalanx of trustees, joined by the then-architecture department chief Terence Riley, flew around the world on Ron Lauder’s private jet and compiled a long-list of ten firms to design the new museum. The prohibitive favourite, the press kept saying, was the Dutch firm OMA, whose principal Rem Koolhaas had just published S, M, L, XL (1995). Koolhaas’s graceless, acerbic, and truly astounding MoMA Inc. plan – greeted with a panegyric in the New York Times and utter horror from the trustees – took as a given that the museum has more functions than just the display of art, and that the building had to take account of them. MoMA Inc. recognized that Miesian purity was not just half a century out of date, but a dishonest articulation of the museum’s activities. The scheme made a feature of Museum Tower, the Pelli condominium that MoMA built the last go-round as a revenue spinner. (There’s actually a rental on the market right now, if you want it: three bedrooms on a nice high floor, and only $30,000 a month. Board approval required!) It acknowledged that commerce and culture were co-extensive, a theme he expatiated on in his Harvard Design School Guide to Shopping of 2002. And it made explicit MoMA’s transubstantiation of economic capital into social prestige, most notoriously in Koolhaas’s collages that featured black-tie revelers next to Matisses and Mirós.

What Koolhaas was saying, with MoMA Inc., was that the interweaving of art and commerce was inevitable; the goal was to manage it, design it, and thereby keep art a meaningful enterprise and not just a decoration for the shop and the restaurant. Far more than the other entrants in a field widely described as weak and uninspired, MoMA Inc. would have ‘ke[pt] the Modern modern,’ wrote critic Witold Rybczynski, rather than indulging in the ‘doctrinaire’ aesthetic of a movement ‘more than seventy years old.’ He was so far ahead of the other participants that Riley grumbled to a critic that a backlash was setting in, that Koolhaas was being victimized for being too obviously the best choice. And what do you know? Not only did Koolhaas lose, but the selection committee didn’t even allow him on the three-firm shortlist. The museum had thought very seriously for years about reinvention, had told the architects ‘to conceptualize a modern museum in the context of the future,’ in director Glenn Lowry’s words – and then, when reinvention was possible, decided that retrenchment was a better call. (‘It’s meant to be a relatively intimate experience,’ said Varnedoe.) The trustees plumped for the oldest architect on a list that, said Riley, had intentionally excluded more senior, experienced names such as Richard Meier and Peter Eisenman. Indeed, they went for the most expensive, least revisionist plan on offer – a plan that didn’t just say ‘no thanks’ to Koolhaas, but screamed ‘fuck off.’

Which is not to say that a vote for Yoshio Taniguchi had to be a vote for entombment. I’ve been to his Gallery of Horyuji Treasures in Tokyo, a smaller and vastly superior building completed in 1999. He is a gifted architect with an uncommonly light touch, and you could have made an argument for him, one in line with the MoMA-as-Orsay model that was under consideration at the time of the charrette. In the days of Frank Gehry and ‘The Art of the Motorcycle’ at the Guggenheim, you could imagine that the Taniguchi MoMA could be a place where art was expensive but at least serious. It would be a place that accepted that modern art had long ceded its antagonistic force, but would do its best to make modernism’s absorption by the establishment into a virtue.

‘The model for MoMA is Manhattan itself,’ Taniguchi told a reporter soon after his victory. Koolhaas, ironically, would have said the exact same thing of his MoMA Inc., but it turns out that Taniguchi was the one who had it right. With the age of Bloomberg soon to dawn, it was his version of Manhattan – elite, well-dressed, and obscenely expensive – which would soon efface the last remaining patches of Koolhaas’s delirious New York. In that sense, if none other, MoMA had a chance to be with the times.

Fourteen years and $858 million later, we are back at the drafting table. You don’t need me to tell you everything that went wrong with Taniguchi’s MoMA, a corporate behemoth unworkable as much other than an event space for private wealth management cocktail parties, whose new building shortchanges older and newer art at once, with a Penn Station-at-rush-hour lobby, a jailhouse façade on West 54th Street, and not even a workable cafeteria. Worst of all has been the minimal increase in space for the permanent collection, which everyone groused about soon after the doors reopened in 2004. In large part the current plans to renovate derive straight from the mistakes made last time, mistakes that seem unpardonable when you consider not only the years and dollars wasted, but also when you recall how seriously and thoroughly MoMA debated its future in those days.

Perhaps, from the perspective of the boardroom, the Taniguchi MoMA doesn’t feel like much of a failure at all. The evidence is in the retention of Lowry, the director, to oversee a second building project just nine years after such a major one, and in the wretched paucity of new space for the permanent collection in the DS+R plan, a point bewailed to no end in the press this past few days. Apologies for getting all Lady Bracknell on you, but to build no significant new gallery space once may be regarded as a misfortune; to do so twice looks like a deliberate strategy. With the exception of the Centre Pompidou in Paris, MoMA is the only museum on the planet with the collection and the resources to showcase the entirety of 20th century art. That it has once again chosen not to do so speaks volumes about the aims of the current institution, which apparently aspires only to wed a de minimis, flow-chart art history 101 upstairs to the funhouse below. What a shift from Pelli’s 1980s renovation, which for all its shortcomings at least was driven by curatorial concerns; back then you could still imaging culture existing independently from money and real estate, if only just. Now the numbers speak for themselves, the museum must be telling itself. Expansion is a birthright, plutocracy is progress, dumbing down is democracy.

I disagree with Jerry Saltz that DS+R are unqualified to build a new MoMA. On the contrary, DS+R have done some of the most impressive cultural buildings in the United States, from the Institute for Contemporary Art in Boston to Alice Tully Hall just a cab ride away from MoMA. Their soon-to-open Broad Museum in Los Angeles looks promising, while their scrapped intervention in the donut hole of the Hirshhorn Museum, could have transformed Washington, D.C. What’s objectionable is the lack of thought that has accompanied DS+R’s preliminary designs, an especially galling development given the imperative that Diller and her team have placed on research in years past. DS+R have not unexpectedly slipped up after years of much better work; it’s much more plausible to conclude that DS+R is not being given a chance to do anything better than the wan designs released this week. Note that the Taniguchi MoMA, for all its severity, at least paid a small tribute to Barr’s vision of a museum of the art of our time. The DS+R MoMA jettisons that; after twelve years of Bloombergism, New York’s ultra-wealthy have new priorities. A three-story ‘art bay’ is more than just a slight to the permanent collection; it barely reflects a commitment to contemporary programming, except of the glitziest and most populist take-a-selfie-with-Marina-Abramović variety. Picasso is fine, if he stays upstairs; ‘Picasso Baby’ on the street is what they really want. In fact, the calamity that is the current MoMA plan makes it much easier to pardon Taniguchi for his own design’s shortcomings. Don’t blame the architect, blame the client.

Learning to Live With MoMA

Former home of the American Folk Art Museum, New York

None of the foregoing touches on the other big brouhaha on West 53rd Street: the destruction of the vacated home of the American Folk Art Museum, designed by Tod Williams and Billie Tsien (who, in a mild irony, also participated in the 1997 MoMA charrette). Perpetually empty on my visits there, its reputation has grown all out of proportion to its attainments during its short life. It’s hard not to notice how its defenders praise its paneled bronze façade almost exclusively; many of them, I suspect, rarely or never went inside, to its bonkers staircases and punishingly narrow galleries that made all the art look like so many trinkets at a Donna Karan store. Even if it were a more successful work of architecture, I still wouldn’t throw myself in front of the wrecking ball. Koolhaas, again, has it right here: too many buildings are preserved, not too few. The responsible way to foster vigorous city life is through more random, less masterpiece-oriented kinds of salvage, and an alleged jewel in a sea of glass towers is not preservation of any worthwhile sort.

The painful truth is that both West 53rd Street museum buildings, MoMA and Folk, are failures, and the only reason to oppose the demolition of the latter is because almost everything else being built on the street is less inspired and more expensive. That is not, I realize, much of a rallying cry, but it is the best I can do. Just look out the windows of MoMA’s galleries and you’ll recall what we’re up against. You don’t need to go to West 59th Street, where Robert A.M. Stern is erecting a supertall limestone skyscraper of almost unimaginable expense. Nor to West 57th Street, whose lovely bookstore in a century-old structure has just been served eviction papers to make way for yet another unnecessary luxury development. Just take your eye away from Pollock and Rothko, or your smartphone, and gaze at 20 West 53rd Street: the Baccarat Hotel and Residences, a grossly over-the-top tower that would make a Miami hustler balk, whose apartments right up to the $60 million penthouse are branded, and this is not a joke, as ‘living as high art.’ It is one of the tackiest buildings in the neighbourhood, and it was made possible only through the destruction of a branch of the New York Public Library – an institution whose megalomaniacal board is currently masterminding its own outrageous act of architectural destruction just down the road. They will be perfect neighbours, the new museum and the Baccarat Hotel and Residences: for both, high art is a branding opportunity for your real mission, namely the gratification of the super-rich.

And this, ultimately, is the real reason that so many people have become so upset about the destruction of the Folk Art Museum. The concern is less about architectural preservation and more about the galling symbolism of the big bad museum next door burying the little guy with its bulldozer and its ‘art bay.’ I get that, but at the risk of being even more of a downer than I already am, I think a little less anger and a little more fatalism is in order. If the museum, back in 1997, had gone for Koolhaas’s full reinvention rather than the incrementalism that has always plagued the place, then perhaps they could have resisted the slow drift into corporatist light entertainment that we now face. But they did not, in 1997, and this time they didn’t even try. Rather than wishing beyond hope that MoMA will change, then, now is time to learn how to live with MoMA – the way we live with a broken healthcare system, say, or climate change. We can all imagine better ways to manage healthcare or prevent environmental ruin, but under the current political and economic dispensation those just aren’t going to happen. And the same is true of culture, I’d argue. MoMA is simply a fact of life, an epiphenomenon of a larger economic and social miscarriage reflected too in the glitzy towers that ring the museum. It is fruitless, and possibly bad for your health, to imagine the museum can be fixed without fixing the seemingly unfixable structures that undergird the place. The best you can do is learn to negotiate it.

Learning to live with MoMA, accommodating oneself to its shortcomings and fishing for the virtues beneath, may be difficult. It seems especially difficult for an older generation who knew the institution, who knew New York itself, when it really was preeminent. This week, reading older critics whom I admire, from Peter Schjeldahl in the New Yorker to Martin Filler in the New York Review of Books, I was struck by their invocation of a MoMA I have never known, a MoMA without Rain Rooms, somewhere that really was the go-to place for the art of our time. I would only say that for anyone under 30 years old, a certain cultural belatedness, with middling quality at a premium price, is just part of the package of life in New York. New York is not even close to the cutting edge anymore, but we clearly don’t mind. If we wanted to be modern we would have followed Koolhaas to China long ago.

The Museum Within the Museum

$
0
0

By Lara Pawson

The Museum Within the Museum

The nails that fixed the tables to the floor proved just how popular it was. The aim of the game was to make the flags of six African countries by sliding tiled segments around within the frame of the tabletop. These puzzles were tackled with such exuberance, however, that the tables themselves began sliding around on the gallery floor. Hence the decision to nail them down.

Meschac Gaba’s Museum of Contemporary African Art (1996–2002) was one of Tate’s most successful exhibitions last year, with more than 220,000 visitors swarming through its 12 rooms between July and September. According to assistant curator Nada Raza, ‘It was extraordinary […] because we had to work out how to not barrier the works in a way that was too prohibitive and interfered with the piece itself. We really did test the limits of what our systems can do.’

Those barrier systems certainly tested my limits during my first visit to the show, on a Saturday in early August. It was packed. The sound of buzzers was incessant as many visitors, including myself, repeatedly breached the security lines around parts of the installation. A stressed, but polite, Tate staffer dashed about warning people not to cross the wires taped to the floor while fielding calls on her walkie-talkie.

In the Architecture Room, adults and children were frantically piling up blocks of wood, then knocking them over. On a piano in the Salon, two girls were playing two-finger ‘Chopsticks’, an irritating tune that people who can’t play the piano properly always seem to know. In the Game Room, a competitive parent was boasting to her teenage children about her superior ability to reconstruct the Algerian flag. My partner tried to console me with one of the many chocolate coins laid out on top of the piano, but what I really wanted was a beer from the Salon’s bar. In vain: it seemed that, here, Gaba’s assault on gallery norms had broken itself on the more inflexible laws of alcohol licensing. The bar was dry and empty.

The Museum Within the Museum

In the Wedding Room, I winced at a video of Gaba’s marriage ceremony in 2000, which was attended by figures such as Chris Dercon, then director of Museum Boijmans van Beuningen in Rotterdam, now director of Tate Modern. I wondered if this entire installation was really an exclusive conversation between the artist and an art elite; and I felt mildly cheated that, unlike the VIP guests, visitors to Tate were not permitted to donate gifts to Gaba and his wife.

The Museum Within the Museum

My frustration peaked when I reached the Museum Shop. Contrary to what I’d heard about this part of the work – that one could buy the art works of Gaba’s friends and contemporaries – there was little on offer that wasn’t also available in Tate’s own shop. Beside a mock African market, a Tate employee sat beside an electronic till selling Tate postcards, Tate T-shirts, Tate books, Tate pencils, giant chocolate coins and, for a tenner each, some non-Tate ‘African’ bottle-openers.

The Museum Within the Museum

Perhaps my disappointment would have been checked if the Tarot reader had been present in the Art and Religion Room, but, alas, I was there on one of the days she was not. Maybe I would have felt better if I could have gone for a ride on one of the Museum’s bicycles lined up beside the escalators outside, but due to an insurance glitch they were not available either.

Exiting the building, I came to the conclusion that by acquiring and then exhibiting Gaba’s Museum, Tate had destroyed it. Or, put another way, by choosing to sell his Museum to Tate, Gaba had destroyed it himself. For what was once a live, interactive, metamorphosing event without walls was now a museum within a museum – like a corpse in formaldehyde – with walls, buzzers and nails to boot.

The Museum Within the Museum

And yet, I couldn’t quite leave it there. A few weeks later, determined to find a more positive way in to the work, I returned. This time, I visited early on a weekday. Crossing the Millennium Bridge, I pondered Tate’s proximity to the City of London, that very British tax haven. I considered the wealth of the city and the fact that much of it is built on our brutal history of empire. Looking over the Thames, I noticed a KPMG tourist boat motoring by and, printed down one side of it, the words ‘cutting through complexity’. I thought of the reports I’ve read about KPMG’s dealings, not only with the British government, but other governments too, including several on the African continent. This chain of thoughts reminded me of the unsavoury relationship between some of the banks in the City of London and Nigeria’s former head of state, General Sani Abacha. As I approached Tate Modern, Gaba’s Museum of Contemporary African Art came back to mind. I thought about the art industry and the way that money is laundered as it passes between wealthy elites around the globe; I thought about the place of Tate within that world; and I thought about Gaba’s Museum within Tate. What, I wondered, is its purpose?

The Museum Within the Museum

I know what the artist himself has said: that when he embarked on the work in the mid-1990s he wanted to create a place in which contemporary African art could exist. Tate’s blurb describes it as ‘a provocation to the Western art establishment not only to acknowledge contemporary African art but to ask why such cultural boundaries exist’. By all accounts, it certainly challenged Tate: assistant curator Raza, said its impact on staff had been ‘revolutionary’. While I would definitely not want to underrate the importance of that, on my second and third visits to the Museum, I still felt troubled by what always seems to have been the primary goal of the work – to enter the international market. Why? Because in the very process of gathering the work, the institution that acquired it now governs it too.

Funnily enough, a year ago, speaking to frieze editors, Dercon spoke of the need for big museums to change. ‘You have to be radically different and to rethink the notion of the museum,’ he said, ‘not just in its physical substance but as a social organization.’ Indeed. And you also need to re-examine not only the way big museums acquire art, but the way they exhibit it too. To borrow from a recent Tate lecture by the artist, writer and performer Tim Etchells, you want to avoid the ‘agony of fixing’ and of pushing art down that ‘slippery slope’ in which everything ends up ‘getting nailed down’.

Strike: Opera #3

$
0
0

By Agnieszka Gratza

Strike: Opera #3

Ulf Aminde, Strike: Opera #3, 2013, performance documentation, Schaubühne, Leipzig. All images courtesy: Museum of Contemporary Art Leipzig (GfZK)

Protesting protest

Dramatis Personae (in order of appearance):

ULFAMINDE, Berlin-based artist
JOANNAWARSZA, curator of ‘Performative Democracy’ at the GfZK Leipzig
BENJAMINMEYER-KRAMER, teacher on the Cultures of the Curatorial program, Academy of Visual Arts, Leipzig
FRANCISCA ZÓLYOM, director of GfZK Leipzig
ANNASCHMIKAT, artist based in Leipzig
JENNYBAINES, artist based in London
LENKAKUKUROVA, activist and curator, GfZK Leipzig
FELIXMEYER, Berlin-based artist
AGNIESZKAGRATZA, writer from London
ANJA LÜCKENKEMPER and ANNADUBROCKI, curators, graduates of Cultures of the Curatorial, based in Leipzig and Berlin
JULIAKURZ, cultural worker based in Leipzig
OMERKRIEGER, artist and activist from Tel Aviv
TEATUPAIJC, theatre director from Zagreb
THOMASWESKI, professor on the Cultures of the Curatorial program, living in Leipzig and Berlin
EVASCHARRER, Berlin-based curator and writer
KOLJAREICHART, Berlin-based writer
RAIMARSTANGE, writer and art critic based in Berlin
Others who shall remain nameless
Chor der Unterbrechung (‘Chorus of Interruption’)
A cellist, a double bass player, a viola player, two violinists, two horn players, two oboe players (members of the Mendelssohn Kammerorchester Leipzig) seated amid the audience

Place: the scene is the black, spotlit interior of the Schaubühne, an art deco theatre and former dance hall in the city of Leipzig

Time: 17 December 2013, 7-9pm

Strike: Opera #3

Prologue

Following two other performance-based, context-specific projects by Alexandra Pirici and Pablo Helguera which took place in October, Strike: Opera #3 by Ulf Aminde was the third and final installment in Joanna Warsza’s ‘Performative Democracy’ event series staged in public spaces around Leipzig as part of the ‘Responsive Subjects’ project curated by Julia Schäfer and Franciska Zólyom of the Museum of Contemporary Art Leipzig (GfZK).

Drawn from Polish sociologist Elżbieta Matynia’s 2009 study by that title, the concept of ‘performative democracy’ is itself informed by J. L. Austin’s ‘speech acts’ theory: the idea that certain utterances (promises, orders and the like) actually enact what they say. For Matynia, performative democracy is not so much a theoretical model as ‘a locally conditioned process of enacting democracy in politically varied contexts’. She sees the Polish Solidarity protest strikes in the 1980s as ‘in many ways a masterpiece of performative democracy’. One is at liberty to find the concept half-baked (along with many other ‘performative’ this, that, and the other), but it has a certain resonance in the specific context of Leipzig, the city of the Monday Demonstrations – a series of peaceful political protests staged in and around Nikolaikirche on Monday evenings in 1989 and beyond – that culminated in the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Strike: Opera #3

Action

‘Strike: Opera’ (2011-2013) started life as Strike Orchestra (a pun on streichorchester, German for ‘string orchestra’) at the Heildelberger Kunstverein and was subsequently restaged, in a different guise, for an international audience of artists and activists, at the ‘Truth Is Concrete 24/7’ marathon in Graz, Austria in September 2012. For its third iteration in Leipzig Berlin-based Ulf Aminde had invited fellow artists and ‘cultural producers’ – based mainly in Leipzig and Berlin but also from further afield – to formulate in writing their thoughts regarding a possible strike within the art world and whether it could or should happen.

Together with sundry texts documenting well-known historical precedents, such as Gustave Courbet’s Letter to the Artists of Paris (1971), Lee Lozano’s 1969 General Strike Piece or the 13 Demands addressed to Bates Lowry, the then-director of MoMA, New York by the Artist Workers Coalition in 1969, these statements formed a script, a libretto of sorts, for a future opera, at least in the mind of the artist. ‘It was just a fantasy,’ says Aminde. ‘But I tried to let the evening be structured by this fantasy.’ After a brief introduction by Aminde, designated readers seated amid the audience (and musicians from the Mendelssohn Kammerorchester Leipzig) would walk up to the microphone one by one and deliver their texts to the (occasional) sound of a player rehearsing. The music also acted as a palette cleanser between the successive readings, which felt more like a drawn-out lecture-performance delivered by multiple speakers than an opera.

Cast in the role of participant-observant, I was asked to read two of the 13 Demands as well as Lucy R. Lippard’s spirited reply to Goran Dordevic’s proposal for an International Art Strike in 1979: ‘Sorry to take so long, but rather than strike I spend all my energy on striking back at the art system by working around and outside of it and against it and letting it pay for my attempts to subvert it.’ Aminde’s rationale for including this and two other letters to Dordevic by Hans Haacke and Carl Andre, equally dismissive of the idea of an art strike, wasn’t entirely clear. With no time to discuss any of the individual texts and points they raised, those in attendance were left to draw their own conclusions – and strike back.

Strike: Opera #3

Interruption of Action

Writing about Bertold Brecht’s epic theatre, Walter Benjamin suggested that the interruption of the action has an alienating effect that creates a space for reflection. This idea underpins Aminde’s performative work, none more so than Strike: Opera #3, at least on paper. According to the blurb, in the piece ‘Aminde reflects on the identity of art community, the logic of its self-determination, its capacities to create significant disruption or a meaningful act of withdrawal.’ But when faced with just such a disruption or act of withdrawal, the artist (and the curator) appeared taken aback, unable to react quickly enough even when pressed to do so by the audience.

Disclosure: my understanding of the situation that arose was approximate at best since from that point onwards I was reliant on impromptu translations to follow the exchange. That said, the most powerful aspect of art critic and curator Raimar Stange’s intervention was in fact non-verbal. The interruption, roughly two-thirds of the way into the 25 planned readings as if designed to test the patience of a well-disposed audience, took the form of a silent statement. What at first seemed like a rhetorical pause grew into a prolonged silence, which effectively amounted to a strike against the action with a knock-on effect on the rest of the speakers who, whether out of solidarity with Stange or not, refused to break it by reading out their own texts.

Aminde is understandably of the view that Stange hijacked the event and used it as a platform to voice his own grievances as a freelance writer and critic. Instead of receiving a fee for his contribution to Strike: Opera #3, as one of the rare participants from outside of Leipzig his travel expenses had been covered by the GfKZ. And yet Stange’s complaints about the ‘missing fee’ were in line with the demands put forward in the 2011_Haben und Brauchen_ (‘To Have and To Need’) manifesto, which has shaped Aminde’s understanding of ‘artistic labour’. To invoke said manifesto, borne out of the specific context of Berlin’s contemporary art scene: ‘Based on the justification that the exposure to a public should be compensation enough, artistic work – and public relations as well as curatorial work in the art field – are as a general rule, badly paid or not paid at all.’

Whatever his personal motivations for bringing the opera to an abrupt close, Stange’s intervention created an opportunity for a genuine debate to take place at last. But instead on discussing the why and wherefore of an art strike to come, the audience appeared intent on attacking the event’s form, forcing the artist to defend himself and expecting him to find a way out of a situation that was not of his making.

Strike: Opera #3

Epilogue

Eventually, music proved to be the way forward, after an exasperated musician from the Mendelssohn Kammerorchester Leipzig added her dissenting voice to the ‘Chorus of Interruption’ (Chor der Unterbrechung) by announcing that, come what may, she would not stay beyond 9pm (ten or so minutes away at that stage) since she has only been paid to play until then. The starting point of Strike: Opera, in all its iterations, has been Joseph Haydn’s Symphony No. 45, also known as the ‘Farewell Symphony’, written for Haydn’s patron Nikolaus Esterházy in 1772, during a prolonged stay at the Prince’s summer residence in Eszterháza that kept the court orchestra musicians away from their homes. Aminde takes the piece, which sees the musicians slip away one by one during the final deliberately anticlimactic adagio in protest against the unreasonable working conditions, to be a proto-art strike, all the more effective for being inscribed in musical form.

Strike: Opera #3

One of the evening’s many ironies and interesting outcomes, the musician’s throwaway comment spoke volumes about the different attitudes towards work in the art and the music world. Leipzig-based artist Bertram Haude, whose statement written for the occasion was never read out as a result of the strike by the performers, sees Haydn’s musicians as no different to cooks, gardeners, coachmen, and other paid staff, rather than as artists who would want to play their own music – for the love of it rather than for wages, presumably. Meant to be performed once all the texts had been read out, the well-known finale of Haydn’s ‘Farewell Symphony’ that the musicians had been mock-rehearsing all evening brought about a tentative reconciliation if not quite a sense of closure.

Sketches of Sorrento

$
0
0

By Amy Sherlock

Sketches of Sorrento

Mural from the stairwell of the Hilton Sorrento Palace

It is said that the Bay of Naples was home to the sirens, those mythical seductresses whose song was so sweet and promised so much that it lured passing sailors to their deaths on the jagged outcrops of the archipelago that now takes their name, ‘Le Sirenuse’. None could resist them.

Half women, half birds, the sirens of the ancient Greeks were not the lovely porcelain-skinned nymphs that popular culture has returned to us, by way first of the Pre-Raphaelites and later of Walt Disney, in hybridised mermaid form. By an interesting quirk of fate or of grammar, the name by which these islands are more commonly known, ‘Li Galli’ (The Roosters), stays truer to these feathered origins, though with the sexual potency of the femme fatale displaced onto the cock of the roost._

Ulysses the trickster, ‘so full of guile,’ says Kafka, ‘such a fox, that not even the goddess of fate could pierce his armour’, was the only mortal to hear the siren’s prophecy and pass by unscathed, lashed to the mast by his crew, their ears stuffed with wax. But even he never reached the shores of the sirens’ islands. No one ever did, not in any version of the story that I have ever heard. Why is it, then, that we so often see the sirens painted from behind, looking out to sea and the powder-sailed ships, as if the artist has somehow managed to slip through the trap and made it to land? But maybe this is not so far fetched. After all, another tale has it that the Argo owed its safe passage to the lyre Orpheus. The poet, the Ur-artist, drowned out the siren’s call, an equal master of treacherous words and limitless promises.

_For monster and muses, artists, poets and tricksters alike, the allure of the Bay of Naples remains little dimmed since Ulysses’ fast black ship sped hence on its way back to Ithaca. And where better to spend 2013’s twilight hours – that in-between moment as one year becomes the next – than on it’s myth-steeped, citrus-scented coastline. At the invitation of the Fiorrucci Arts Trust (founder Nicoletta Fiorucci, director Milovan Farronato and curator Stella Bottai) a merry band gathered in a Neptune’s cove in Sorrento. (In fact the pool of the Hilton Sorrento Palace hotel, where we stayed as guests of Giovanni Russo, Fiorucci’s partner.) In full view of Vesuvius and its past-preserving slopes, and amongst jewel-flecked orange groves that pointed to the spring not far away, we passed a topsy-turvy moment of carnivalesque transformations – aided and abetted by light-fingered seamstresses, swathes of fabric and slicks of facepaint – prophecy and promises…

Sketches of Sorrento
Sketches of Sorrento
Sketches of Sorrento
Sketches of Sorrento
Sketches of Sorrento
Sketches of Sorrento

Sketches and costume designs by the author and other guests, made during costume workshops at Hilton Sorrento Palace as part of Fiorucci Art Trust’s ‘Party Monster’ celebrations. Fabrics and logo courtesy: Fiorucci Art Trust. Photographs: Alessandro Di Giampietro


Poser Punks: Derek Jarman & Jordan Wolfson

$
0
0

By Jonathan P. Watts

Poser Punks: Derek Jarman & Jordan Wolfson

Derek Jarman, The Angelic Conversation (1985)

It was a baffling week. But then when is it not? A couple of weeks ago, on a Friday evening, my friends (lesbians, feminists too) and I joined a memorial service at King’s College Chapel on the Strand to commemorate what would have been Derek Jarman’s 72nd birthday. Gilded twin arches of the George Gilbert Scott interior framed a bed sheet suspended centrally in the transept. Emerging from the twilight a creased sheet – splayed open, a poignant image of vulnerability – bore a projection of Jarman’s old-fashioned signature, and later a 24-hour looped screening of his 1985 film The Angelic Conversation.

Derek Jarman, The Angelic Conversation (1985)

To further frame the screening, artist Neil Barlett was joined by Simon Watney, a tireless AIDS activist and art historian, to remember Jarman. The creased sheet belonged to Barlett: in the late ’80s, as ‘Mistress of Ceremonies’ of the National Review of Live Art in Glasgow, Barlett commissioned a new work by Jarman. They discussed the project on the phone, before Jarman threw himself into the project with typical vitality. In the centre of the gallery space, Jarman displayed a bed zoned off by barbed wire; tarred mattresses edged the gallery walls; on an unmade bed (made between, of course, Yoko Ono’s and John Lennon’s bed-in and Tracey Emin’s un-made bed) young gay men – and apparently Tilda Swinton – took it in turn to lounge among the paraphernalia of gay sex, such as KY jelly, poppers, and so on. Watney – whose absence from New Year’s Honours lists and lack, even, of academic tenure is egregiously symptomatic of Britain’s attitude to its intellectuals – was here because, among other reasons, he publicly defended Jarman when the tabloids peddled ‘plague’ trash and divine retribution for ‘homosexuality’. In the late ’80s, with friends dying in his wake, Watney shuttled back and forth between London and New York to learn newest developments in HIV and AIDS medicine. Watney met Jarman back in the ‘70s. They shared a love for Elizabethan houses, as well as London’s churches and museums. He was, Watney told us, a reliable sounding board for Jarman to test feature film ideas. When Jarman laid dying of AIDS-related illness in St Bart’s Hospital, Watney would read quietly to this husk of a man. Barlett’s and Watney’s remembrances were, frustratingly, only glancing, necessarily limited to the hour before the 7pm screening. Watney repeated the same (no less affecting) familiar stories. A few particular comments lodged in my mind.

Poser Punks: Derek Jarman & Jordan Wolfson

Derek Jarman

Had Derek been alive, many of us, Barlett noted, would be partying, drinking, dancing and listening to his gregarious stories. Jarman was outlived by many of his contemporaries. Consequently, audiences at Jarman exhibitions, screenings and events in London are attended by many who knew him: it’s a fascinating glimpse at living history. (‘When you reach 50,’ Barlett said to Watney in their conversation, ‘you become history’.) Yet, increasingly, such events are curiously divided, between those who knew him personally, and younger people who, although may not have not met him, feel tremendous affection for, ownership of, this public figure. At the recent opening of the exhibition of Jarman’s notebooks, also at King’s College, this older generation looked confused by youth’s presence. (I recently experienced something like the paranoiac reproach of the older generation when I wrote about Jarman’s paintings for Wilkinson Gallery late last year. After all, I reasoned with the commissioner, others still alive who knew him could do it, others who were also gay: the great learning from Watney is the violence of speaking for others; from Jarman it’s the vital importance of speaking for oneself.)

In Scott’s chapel, the old familiar intergenerational rift rose again. We must remember, we must not forget our struggles of the 1980s, our history, Barlett insisted. That much I agree with. But when he we went on to say the following I couldn’t help feeling – well – alienated and condescended to (I paraphrase):

‘One thing that annoys me about my students is that they think the ’80s was so glamorous. It wasn’t. It was horrible. We were victimized all the time. They also envy how we knew who the enemy was, whereas they don’t today.’

Not to mention the silencing of absent students who couldn’t speak for themselves, why deny the distortions of nostalgia, distortions that might lead to deeper understanding? No one who wasn’t there can get it right all the time, but at least give us a chance. Allow us to learn from the past in order to understand our present and move forward. This over-vigilant gatekeeping carries internecine effects.

At the end of the conversation, Watney read two very moving texts. The first was the last poem he read to Jarman before his death; the second was Tory legislation on the policing of mobility for Romanians seeking asylum in the UK: those with Hep B and those HIV+ – ‘That’s me,’ Barlett said of the former; ‘That’s me,’ Watney said of the latter – would automatically not be granted asylum. The legislation, by isolating what the two men agreed were gay diseases, evidenced continued prejudice against gays.

Poser Punks: Derek Jarman & Jordan Wolfson

Jordan Wolfson, Raspberry Poser (2012), digital video, computer-generated imagery, hand-drawn animation, sound, 13′ 55”

On the Sunday of the same weekend – shortly after, I suppose, The Angelic Conversation looped itself out on the Strand – I walked to the Chisenhale Gallery in East London for the last day of New York artist Jordan Wolfson’s video installation ‘Raspberry Poser’. At the desk I was instructed to leave my shoes at the gallery door before entering. For some reason separation from my shoes always causes me some anxiety. Besides, my socks, wet from the dew of Victoria Park, looked sweaty and smelly. Perhaps I was immune to their smell? I felt vulnerable.

Raspberry Poser (2012), trailer

Beyoncé’s song ‘Sweet Dreams’ blasted at half-speed as I passed through the double row of black-out curtains, forcefully engulfing me as I continued into the gallery. Inside, a cream pile carpet covered the floor. A vast suspended screen – an image of excess – on which Wolfson’s film was projected, bisected the gallery, illuminating a viewing area in front, while casting the empty space behind into darkness. All around bodies reclined and luxuriated in front of the screen, transforming the gallery into some kind of gigantic home cinema set-up. The song’s pitch-shift lent Beyoncé a demonic male voice and drew attention to the lyrics. ‘You could be a sweet dream or a beautiful nightmare either way I don’t want to wake up from you …’, sings B, accompanied by distant restrains of ‘Come alive’. Animations, of course, do come alive, and the intoxicated refusal to wake, whatever may come, is emblematic of the kinds of mad trysts we experience everyday in various ways. ‘Sweet Dreams’ has a dark, mesmerizing power. When this was followed by ‘Sweet Dreams’ played out at normal speed it made me want to dance, it made me want to run outside, thrust my arms out, vogue, and shake my hips – exactly the effect it has when when I hear it in a nightclub. Its affective power – or whatever the expression is – couldn’t be contained by Wolfson’s framing of it in this installation. I watched it four times. After I’d ceased feeling giddy about ‘Sweet Dreams’, I began concentrating on the images.

A cartoon boy self-eviscerates while returning the gaze; several times he literally cuts himself open to neatly unpack his entrails, like those schematized medical models. This cartoon boy unpacks his body augmented into ‘actual’ shots of sunny street scenes of SoHo in New York. Urbane, cosmopolitan, wealthy, sexy, confident, knowing SoHo. Formerly marginal SoHo. In a plush anonymous hallway, the boy contorts backwards and begins strangling himself. The strangling causes his body to concertina outward from the waist, describing a growing arc. Then he speaks – the only dialogue in the entire work: ‘Are you rich?’ the boy asks. ‘Yes,’ comes his response in a different voice. ‘Are you homosexual?’ he asks. ‘No,’ comes his response, again in a different voice. Is this Wolfson’s voice? Is it the assumed voice of us, the viewer, pruriently speculating on Wolfson? Perhaps this, the only dialogue, concedes that it’s easier to admit to being rich than it is to being ‘homosexual’?

Poser Punks: Derek Jarman & Jordan Wolfson

Raspberry Poser (2012)

Sunny SoHo scenes are augmented too by wafting condoms filled with a fluid consisting of small hearts. Animated HIV virus cells bounce whimsically in unison on yuppy apartment sofas. As I watched I imagined a certain idiotic art director I know who would see in Wolfson’s work a fresh look – fresh looks are what fashion people who spend thousands of pounds on books just for the pictures want. With this visual style, I thought, Wolfson could even direct a music video.

Poser Punks: Derek Jarman & Jordan Wolfson

Raspberry Poser (2012)

At a certain point we join a punk, with severe skinhead, ‘Iggy Pop’ Tippex’d on his leather jacket lapels and spiky Doc Martens, wandering through Paris (it evokes the disaffected youth of Robert Bresson’s L’Argent, 1983). The punk performs disconnection and alienation. He drifts in reverie, running his hand along walls in naive wonderment. He squats in flower beds. Is he a sad punk? He eats a salad in an outdoor seating area – one of those sparse rip-off tourist trap salads that costs €20. Is he a rich punk? Is he even a punk? Towards the end of the loop is a low, sidewards shot of the punk squat on a lawn with his trousers down; he bares his naked, prone arse high in the air. I think of Courbet’s Origin of the World, queered. A non sequitur. Slowly, inevitably, the shot zooms towards his arse and I find myself thinking of Leo Bersani’s ‘Is the Rectum a Grave?’ (1987). A foundational text, written by a gay scholar, on gay promiscuity, promiscuity, Bersani observes, in spite of the HIV virus.

At the end of Raspberry Poser, the sad punk smiles, looks to the side of the camera, then meets its gaze directly, in effect returning our gaze. The punk – for the sake of giving it a name – smiles. The only other who has returned our gaze is the animated boy who can’t help self-eviscerate.

The punk, to give him his proper name, is Jordan Wolfson. Wolfson is mindful of flirting with a gay aesthetic. In Interview magazine recently the sculptor Helen Marten observed how his series of lobster claws adorned with hardcore gay porn are emptied of tactile pleasure. ‘I’m just making these things,’ Wolfson replies. ‘But it’s funny because people will assume that I’m gay or that I’m secretly gay’. Eddie Peake is another artist, among others, who, similarly, wants to act up this gay aesthetic. (Note here also Justin Bieber’s recent sporting of anACT UP T-shirt – the same Bieber who believes Anne Frank would have been a ‘Beleiber’ had she not been murdered by Nazis.) In the Chisenhale’s press material Wolfson describes HIV as a poser. In the interview with Marten he characterises it as floating ‘joyfully around, spinning and expanding and contracting’ in Raspberry Poser. Actually this harbinger moves with insipid joylessness through now gentrified neighbourhoods that were once scenes of SoHo’s AIDs pandemic. Wolfson is not a punk, nor is he gay. So is what we see here some post-identity dispatch from New York? Are we in a post-identity, anything-goes world? Only three weeks ago, a young black feminist spoke on London radio about how it was never, ever acceptable for a white person to use the N-word, even if they love black music and have black friends. Before Christmas I argued – for the sake of argument – with a young lesbian critic who chided a straight male curator at the ICA, talking openly about a post-gay aesthetic. ‘Yeah,’ I goaded, ‘but isn’t this the fall-out from queer studies? The great lesson is that identities are never final. Besides, queer is not the exclusive reserve of the LGBT community. And art and the culture industry will instrumentalize it whoever objects.’ This curator was at the King’s College Jarman screening. One of my group of friends had arranged to meet her there. We were reintroduced and I apologized for being argumentative.

Are you rich? Yes. Are you homosexual? No. If Wolfson has anxieties about his own private wealth, his own tendency for posturing, his own megalomaniac neuroses, the legacy of the AIDS crisis should not be a vehicle for this.

+++

With thanks to Laura E. Guy for discussing aspects of this article with me.

On the Boycott of the 2014 Biennale of Sydney

$
0
0

By Helen Hughes

On the Boycott of the 2014 Biennale of Sydney

Rallies have been held throughout Australia with activists voicing their concerns over the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers interned on Nauru and Manus Island. Photograph: Siobhan Marren/Getty Images

There have recently been calls to boycott the 2014 Biennale of Sydney due to the Biennale’s financial support from Transfield, a multinational corporation that, among many other services such as superannuation, waste management and public transport, are involved in the building and management of Australia’s offshore mandatory detention centres for asylum seekers on Nauru and on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea.

*The Australian government’s approach to asylum seeker policy, which includes the offshore processing of those who arrive through ‘unofficial channels’, is widely regarded as draconian. A bipartisan reality, it has been condemned as contravening national obligations as laid out in the 1951 Refugee Convention, as well as a variety of international human rights laws. In addition, Transfield recently won a contract from the Australian government to take over the management of garrison and welfare services in these detention centres, meaning that the one company manages detainees’ housing, security, transport, catering, cleaning, psychological and medical support. (Note that many detainees become psychologically disturbed and even suicidal during their confinement in such detention centres.)

This most recent contract between Transfield and the Australian government has demonstrated how the incremental privatisation of Australia’s on- and offshore detention centres has developed into an extremely lucrative industry. Transfield’s contracts between 2013 and 2014 amounted to a figure in the three-hundred-millions of dollars. It is a gesture that allows the government to shunt culpability for its infamous treatment of asylum seekers by placing the onus onto a private corporation, and one that gives corporations like Transfield (along with G4S and Serco) a financial incentive to maintain and even expand the mandatory detention industry — despite pressure from the international community to shut it down.

The recent public campaign to boycott the Biennale was sparked by a Sydney academic named Matthew Kiem a fortnight ago, via his blog, an entry on the online forum ‘The Conversation’, and his Twitter account. Bianca Hester, Charlie Sofo, Nathan Gray and Gabrielle de Vietri, four Australian artists invited to participate in this year’s Biennale of Sydney, then formed the collective ‘Working Group’ to lobby the Board of the Biennale of Sydney to divest itself of all financial support from Transfield, and to urge Transfield, in turn, to send a message to the Australian government to end the mandatory detention of asylum seekers. They were then joined by twenty-four other participating artists in sending an open letter to the Board of the Biennale of Sydney outlining their request in solidarity. (The letter can be read online here: http://lamblegs.wordpress.com/2014/02/19/an-open-letter-to-the-board-of-directors-biennale-of-sydney/.) In the meantime, public meetings held in Sydney and Melbourne have sought to unite the local arts communities with local refugee activist and advocacy groups in the broader campaign.

However, as the government continues to privatise its management of detention centres by handing over contracts to companies like Transfield, it becomes increasingly unclear to whom artists and activists should direct their protest, and whether or not a boycott would have any affect whatsoever. Most people would agree, though, that a boycott could not possibly make the already inhumane conditions for detained asylum seekers any worse; these conditions include the detention of children, the separation of families, and utterly inadequate mental and physical health facilities, which, according to a recent report by Amnesty International, constitute a breach of human rights. This confusion is, it would seem, the very point of the privatisation because it kickstarts an endless, and highly calculated, deferral of blame.

As a private corporation that is intricately entwined with Australian public infrastructure, Transfield is a many-headed Hydra. In this way, the Transfield–Biennale of Sydney tract is emblematic of a broader problem that is not exclusive to art and its system of patronage. The backdrop of the Biennale of Sydney, which is in its nineteenth iteration this year, does, however, provide a particularly symbolic backdrop for the staging of this protest. This year’s Biennale is titled ‘You Imagine What You Desire’ and its artistic director is the Australian Juliana Engberg, the long-time director of the Australian Centre for Contemporary Art in Melbourne, where many of the artists included in the Biennale have previously exhibited. The Biennale sets out to explore the ways in which contemporary artists imagine other worlds through acts of poesis and metaphor, and reflect on the way that contemporary art often functions as a meta-commentary on political, social and climatic contexts. This approach is clearly reflected in the work of one of the Australian artists invited to participate in the Biennale, Bianca Hester, whose poetical-political and often instructional works see transient communities forming around simple, symbolic events — like assembling in a public space, or erecting an abstract banner in front of parliament house.

Strangely enough, Engberg’s curatorial rationale was echoed in a recent statement made by Transfield in response to mounting upset over its sponsorship of the Biennale. Here, Transfield did not defend its ethical position on profiting from the detainment of those who feel compelled to leave their own countries and seek asylum in Australia, some of the most vulnerable people in the world, but rather accepted that its business was indeed ‘controversial’ and coolly accounted for this controversy by helping to fund a Biennale that ‘promotes creativity and imagination, and enables artists to express their views on controversial issues’ like mandatory detention.1 That is, while Transfield profits from the mandatory detention industry to the tune of hundreds-of-millions in the real world, the corporation helps provide a space for artists to imagine other, more desirable worlds — worlds in which mandatory detention, and companies like Transfield, do not exist — by funding platforms like the Biennale of Sydney.

Confusing the matter further, Transfield was, in fact, the founding sponsor of the Biennale in 1973. While Transfield was not building offshore detention centres on government contract in the 1970s, it was in 2012 (on the island continent of Nauru) when the 18th Biennale of Sydney, ‘all our relations’ — curated by Gerald McMaster and Catherine de Zegher, took place. That year, non-participating Melbourne-based artist Van Thanh Rudd protested Transfield’s sponsorship of the Biennale, arguing that Transfield cannot simultaneously make a profit on the ‘misery of refugees, while claiming that it supports freedom of expression in the arts’.2 This year, the Australian art community appears to be more receptive to the notion of a protest, perhaps largely due to a new secrecy-pact presided over by Immigration Minister Scott Morrison that makes attempted arrivals by boat completely invisible to the Australian public by concealing such news items from the media. This is in addition to the offshore processing policy itself, which is also a blatant form of concealment.

Art will always possess the potential to expose such injustices, to make them visible. And, as Engberg recognises, much of its power is grounded in its capacity to propose alternatives and possible ‘antidotes’. Moreover, the platform of a biennale-type exhibition, which is premised upon globality, offers a channel through which to make such injustices visible to an international community. And when this platform is ethically compromised by its funding structure, as with the current Biennale of Sydney, art can even expose this, the very contradiction of its own condition — it can critique its capitalist context whilst forming an intrinsic and complicit part of it. Engberg duly recognises this capacity of art as well, and has encouraged participating artists who feel ethically conflicted to use the Biennale to explore their concerns.

As riots continue to break out in the centres on Manus Island, resulting in one death and seventy-seven injuries already this week, the protest is of utmost urgency. And for this reason it is worth remembering that even if the Biennale did somehow manage to divest itself of funds from Transfield, that would solve the problem for art — but not the problem faced by incarcerated asylum seekers, which is evidently much graver. In this sense, the protest should be aimed jointly at the government policy and its privatisation, in which Transfield is wholly complicit, and leverage the intelligence and grace of expression with which the artists, arts workers and artistic director of the Biennale are so well equipped to communicate the message: end mandatory detention.

1. ‘Transfield Holdings Comment on Concerns Regarding Biennale of Sydney’, Transfield, http://www.transfield.com.au/news/183-transfield-holdings-comment-on-concerns-regarding-biennale-of-sydney accessed 19 February 2014. 2. ‘Supporting the call to Boycott the 19th Biennale of Sydney (2014)’, http://vanthanhrudd.wordpress.com/ accessed 19 February 2014.

Postcard from Bangkok

$
0
0

By Bharti Lalwani

Postcard from Bangkok

Manit Sriwanichpoom, _The Election of Hatred
, 2011, 36 photographs, each: 
60 x 90 cm. All photographs courtesy: Jakarin Tewtao

I’m sitting at a table, sipping jasmine tea and chatting with strangers while separating the roots from a sizeable mound of bean sprouts at Bangkok Art and Culture Centre (BACC). We’ve been invited to join Amanda Heng, one of Singapore’s pioneering performance artists, as part of her work ‘Let’s Chat’ (first performed in 1996).

We are all here for the opening night of ‘Concept, Context, Contestation: Art and the Collective in Southeast Asia’, an exhibition of contemporary art from Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, Burma and Cambodia. Curated by Singapore-based specialist on Southeast Asian art Iola Lenzi, with co-curators Agung Hujatnikajennong (Indonesia) and Vipash Purichanont (Thailand), the exhibition showcases 60 artworks by nearly 40 Southeast Asian artists of three generations.

‘Concept, Context, Contestation’ is the second significant institutional exhibition in recent years to examine Southeast Asian contemporary art within its own historical context rather than in relation to China, Japan or the rest of the world. The first, also curated chiefly by Lenzi was ‘Negotiating Home, History and Nation: Two Decades of Contemporary Art in Southeast Asia 1991-2011’ at the Singapore Art Museum in 2011. After ‘Negotiating Home…’, ‘Concept, Context, Contestation: art and the collective in Southeast Asia’ expands on one of the 2011 exhibition’s key currents, conceptualism grown out of local context.

Postcard from Bangkok

Amanda Heng (centre-right) with guests performing, Let’s Chat, 1996/2013, 
performance

‘Concept, Context …’ includes a different set of interactive installations, performance, photography, digital media and paintings by early innovators as well as younger artists from the region. Imelda Cajipe-Endaya (b. 1949, Philippines), FX Harsono (b. 1949, Indonesia), Amanda Heng (b. 1951, Singapore), Vasan Sitthiket (b. 1957, Thailand), Vu Dan Tan (1946-2009, Vietnam) and Lee Wen (b. 1957, Singapore) are some of the region’s pioneering artists featured. Exhibited together for the first time at BACC, their works show the extent to which the region’s art history and conceptual approaches to expression are interconnected. Recurring themes span issues of race, ethnicity, patriarchy, corruption, gender and social inequality and the use of religion as a political tool. Meditations on the same themes are also evident in the work of a younger generation of artists. Together, the connections between locally-rooted conceptual approaches and social ideologies in Southeast Asian art of the last four decades are made apparent.

As is well known, the latter part of the twentieth century was a troubled period in the region’s history, and with protests against Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra’s government that began just the week before the opening, made CCC a timely show.

With the demonstrations going on in the heart of Bangkok, this exhibition quite astutely leads with works of Thai artists Sutee Kunavichayanont, Manit Sriwanichpoom and Vasan Sitthiket. Appropriately, the show opens with Sriwanichpoom’s The Election of Hatred (2011), a set of 36 large-scale photographs of election posters from all Thai political parties. Ordinary, except that these are photographs of portraits on promotional political banners around the city that have been mutilated by the people. Shinawatra’s mouth for instance has been slashed through, rendering her metaphorically mute and ineffective. Kunavichayanont, for his part, extends an earlier series with History Class II (2013). A set of 23 school desks are etched with salient imagery from Thai political history. The first edition of 14 desks, History Class (Thanon Ratchadamnoen), featured in ‘Negotiating Home…’ and was originally placed outdoors at the foot of the Democracy Monument in Bangkok in 2000. On each occasion of display, the public has been invited to sit and make rubbings on paper from the etched desks and take home an assortment of crucial events in Thai history that have been written out of (or excluded from) school textbooks. “History Class,’ Lenzi explains, ‘embodies Southeast Asian conceptual art in that it perfectly combines real social issues, the forceful involvement of the audience in discovering these histories, and an allusive, codified approach to critique, the desks referencing the state and the education system as nationalist propaganda.”

Postcard from Bangkok

Vasan Sitthiket, Blue October (detail), 1996, tempera and gold leaf on canvas, 6 pieces, each 1.5 × 1.5 m

Blue October (1996) by Sitthiket, a set of six paintings, references the 1976 Thammassat University massacres in Thailand. Icy cobalt-blue surrounds monochrome scenes of brutality borrowed from media images of the day. Deliberately uncomfortable in their violent iconography, these stark paintings are also visually seductive. On close examination, small squares of gold leaf appear on the shoulders of the dead, marking them as martyrs. Re-contextualized, grounded in reality, this act of appropriation and reference makes up the conceptual core of the work. Blue October was first displayed for only three days at a small gallery in Chatuchak market in Bangkok in 1996. “These paintings had been forgotten”, said Lenzi, ‘and after their weekend stint at Chatuchak in 1996, were never seen in Thailand again until now. The paintings fit this show perfectly, illustrating how regional artists combine conceptual approaches and powerful images related to local issues to rope audiences in. With their mix of references that all Thais can read, and their print-media appropriated representation of the massacre, they are as scary-stunning today as when first painted nearly twenty years ago.”

Another artwork that attests to social and political instability, this time in Indonesia, is FX Harsono’s Pistal Krupuk Semoga Menjadi Piatal Beneran (What would you do if these crackers were real pistols?). This is the earliest work in the show, originally made in 1977 and specially recommissioned for BACC. Harsono piled pinkish edible gun-shaped rice-crackers on the gallery floor. Next to this cheerfully coloured mound, visitors can record their responses to the piece. Pistal … evolved from the steady clampdown on criticism of President Suharto’s authoritarian regime (1967–98). Harsono’s wafer-guns and Kunavichayanont’s desks operate as catalysts for social change rather than offering a simple reflection of it.

Postcard from Bangkok

From the series ‘TOSS’, 2013, 
Japanese ink, seal ink, rubber soap on Nepalese handmade paper (10 pieces), 79 × 53 cm

Delicately tackling race, the young Singapore artist Tay Wei Leng presented a sound piece in which one hears the recitation of the Singapore Pledge of Allegiance. Recited in schools, on National Day Parade and by those taking up Singaporean citizenship, the Pledge specifically disregards race, language or religion in order “to build a democratic society based on justice and equality”. Tay had 30 foreigners recite the pledge, cryptically alluding to the migrants who have built the island-state. Tay plays on the image of multi-ethnic coherence that Singapore projects on the world stage and questions the veracity of this pledge in a society increasingly stalked by xenophobia.

However, where Tay is subtle, the first generation Singaporean conceptualist Tang Mun Kit is more unequivocal. His ‘TOSS’ series (The Other Singapore Story, 2013) openly critiques the state. In his direct assessment of former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy, Tang juxtaposes recognizable symbols and political phrases on paper, levying layers of critical appraisal against the social and cultural policies of the ruling party over the last 50 years. He also poses uneasy questions to the citizen who has been willingly pliant over these decades in return for material affluence. Lee’s tenure from 1959 to 1990 yielded Singapore’s rapid economic growth. However, nation-building policies also eroded budding democratic, social and political constructs. The country’s 1979 ‘Speak Mandarin Not Dialect’ policy informs the social bean-sprout cleaning in Heng’s Lets Chat performance. Meant to unify the Chinese communities of Singapore by strengthening a single national language, this policy robbed independent communities of their cultural identities and also prevented the younger generation from communicating with their elders. A product of the successful campaign, the young Heng was left with no linguistic skill to communicate with her dialect-speaking parents. This experience, shared by many of her generation, left her devising other forms of connection. Through her invitation to audiences to embark on the routine chore of cleaning sprouts, Heng’s work reveals how she expands from the personal to address the communal.

Postcard from Bangkok

Imelda Cjipe Endaya, The Wife Is a DH
, 1995, installation at BACC, 2013

The work of Philippine artist Imelda Cajipe-Endaya acknowledges the afflictions another community. Seated next to me during Heng’s performance on the opening night, she recounts a poignant incident that sparked the making of her installation, The Wife is a D.H (1995), also featured in the exhibition. As she separated root from sprout-tips, she recollected the case of Filipina helper Flor Contemplacion. Sentenced to death in Singapore in 1995, under allegedly strange circumstances, for the murder of another Filipina maid and her four-year-old ward, Contemplacion’s guilt was never accepted by the Philippine community.

In The Wife is a D.H the distinct shape of a woman steps out of a suitcase equipped with suggestive heels and a feather duster, as well as various symbols of the Catholic faith. Through literal and metaphoric prompts, Cajipe-Endaya articulates the vulnerability of domestic helpers and other economic migrants the world, and beyond this social exclusion, a universal theme. Not just a nod to helpers from the Philippines, the work also iterates the sociological impact of a country whose economy is based on the export of female labour. The case of Contemplacion, instigated the rising voice of a collective in the Philippines against unfair working conditions and widespread exploitation of their nationals outside their country.

As the ongoing protests in Thailand attest, social, political and cultural tensions are far from resolved in Southeast Asia. The Wife is a D.H, among numerous other works in ‘Concept, Context, Contestation …’ captures the ethos of Southeast Asian artists as drivers of social change, addressing issues that concern their fellow citizens. Their ideologies, responses and iconographies are all grounded in local vernacular, history and intellectual discourse, rather than Duchamp. Through socially charged reference and allusion, these artists, as well as the author’s of the essays in the exhibition’s accompanying catalogue, offer a necessary perspective on Southeast Asia. In a region, where art histories are currently in the process of being written, exhibitions such as ‘Concept, Context, Contestation’ and ‘Negotiating Home, History and Nation’ offer canon-building discourse.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

‘Concept Context Contestation’ has been extended to March 16. A Southeast Asian contemporary art symposium on themes raised by the exhibition takes place at BACC on 5th and 6th of March 2014.

Postcard from Budapest

$
0
0

By Joe Turnbull

Postcard from Budapest

Luca Gőbölyös, Leverkusen (Changing Room), 2013, from the series 'Background'

Straddling the River Danube as it passes through northern Hungary are the formerly separate cities of Buda and Pest, whose unification in 1873 heralded a golden age for the region. On the west bank, the imposing Buda Castle dominates the skyline, overlooking the river from its seat atop Castle Hill. On the opposite bank sits the Neo-Gothic leviathan that is the Hungarian Parliament Building.

The cafe and bar scene is positively thriving, bristling with creative energy. Chief amongst these bustling venues are so-called ‘ruin’ bars like Szimpla Kert, housed in previously derelict buildings. Szimpla Kert is an absolutely breath-taking sight: every inch of its walls are covered in graffiti, layered up over the decades of disuse. There’s a drinks cabinet made out of a baby grand piano, seats made of battered cars sliced in half and old televisions transformed into a lit-up mobile installation; this is a palace of upcycling and a living, breathing artwork in its own right. This buzzing backdrop of cafes and bars provides a fecund ground for artists.

The city’s architecture is a mesmeric patchwork of Baroque, Neo-Renaissance and Art Nouveau facades, with a grandiose, historic building seemingly on every corner. Some are lovingly restored and adoringly lit up at night, flagrantly flaunting their looks; others are visibly decaying, literally crumbling; but very few are empty. It is quite possibly the most spectacularly beautiful city I have ever visited. But the beauty doesn’t hide Budapest’s scars, which are gaping reminders of WWII, Nazi and Soviet occupation. The ‘House of Terror’ museum stands as a living monument to the city’s past troubles. But it’s not just Budapest’s past that is tumultuous; its present, both culturally and politically, is troubled, and as a result its future remains uncertain.

Postcard from Budapest

Szimpla Kert, Budapest, 2014. Photograph: Daniel Edwins

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s right-wing government has been staunchly criticised by arts organisations for its iron-fisted approach to culture, having replaced a number of high profile cultural personnel with figures from within the party. For instance, Laszlo Simon, a government MP, became head of the National Cultural Fund of Hungary, an institution that was previously independent of the government. Orbán has publicly stated his desire to establish a “a new modern, right-wing culture,” and in 2012 commissioned an exhibition celebrating 1000 years of Hungarian history focusing on Christianity and statehood, which included a huge image of himself. The exhibition was hosted at the National Gallery, whose then director, Ferenc Csak resigned in protest, saying “The government shouldn’t have the power to order exhibitions with such a high political agenda”.

Orbán’s government have been further accused of a lack of transparency over major cultural policy decisions and of concentrating decision-making powers in the hands of a small, formerly private group of conservative artists, the Hungarian Art Academy (MMA). Unite for Contemporary Art, a group of artists and cultural representatives wrote an open letter last year attacking the government’s culture policy: “It is practically written into the new Hungarian Constitution that works reflecting a Christian-nationalist ideology will be given priority when state subsidies are disbursed”.

Previously, Budapest had an independent network of public galleries dedicated to contemporary art, but in recent years this has been dwindling. Although the New Budapest Gallery is seconded to the Budapest History Museum, it is seeking to plug that gap and reinvigorate the city’s contemporary art scene. Fittingly housed in the shiny new Bálna building, a short distance down the Danube’s east bank from Parliament, the New Budapest Gallery opened its doors last October. The Bálna stands out amongst Budapest’s historic architecture, with a steel and glass “whale” flanked by two restored warehouses. It’s eerily quiet inside, sparsely populated by a strange mix of shops, cafes and unfilled retail units. Clearly this new centre is still finding its feet: it feels a bit sanitised and soulless, like a failing shopping centre. It’s strange place to find a contemporary art gallery with a decidedly critical outlook.

Postcard from Budapest

Peter Turk, Brick Picture – “the breadth and length and height and depth …” (Eph. 3.16 to 20), 2011

The New Budapest Gallery takes up a good chunk of the first floor, occupying a massive space. Budapest Immersion, the gallery’s inaugural show, is fittingly monumental in scale and scope, exhibiting more than 60 of Budapest’s leading contemporary artists. The exhibition is a collaborative effort between three curators Gábor Andrási, Péter Fitz and Tamás Török, aiming to present a representative “cross section” of Budapest’s art scene. As such there is no common thematic or aesthetic thread weaving what is a rich tapestry of work together. The danger of this approach is that the exhibition might come across as a stilted attempt to shoehorn as many artists as possible into a single show, but by compartmentalising the vast space and intelligently grouping works into smaller clusters, the curators have ensured that the show remains coherent whilst also showcasing the breadth of talent currently working in the city.

The work grouped off to the left portion of the gallery loosely falls under the category of abstract art which plays on shape and perspective, some of it clearly having a more architectural sensibility. Peter Turk’s painting Brick Picture – “the breadth and length and height and depth …” (Eph. 3.16 to 20) (2011), plays tricks on the eyes and is hypnotically alluring with its insanely brightly coloured ‘bricks’ which criss-cross and undulate. Meanwhile, Faa Balázs’s mathematically precise Libu (2013) is an expansive maze of white lines covering a large section of the gallery floor, resembling a spider’s web or fly’s wing under a microscope. It evokes a decentralised network, strong in its multiplicity and yet the chalk-like texture it is made of hints at fragility; it would easily crack if pressure were applied. This is perhaps an apt metaphor for the current predicament of the art scene in Budapest.

Postcard from Budapest

Peter Tamas, Halasz Solution 2012. Photograph: Oil Ilka

The central section of the gallery houses a number of installation-based pieces. Peter Tamas Halasz’s Solution (2012) cuts an imposing figure; a chain of used car tyres seemingly strung up between two walls. They’re dirty, soiled and burdensome and give the illusion of being suspended, perhaps suggesting the weight of climate change hanging from our collective neck. With no visible cut marks, it also leaves you scratching your head as to how the tyres have been linked together. This is cause for more proverbial head-scratching: firstly, at the ingenuity associated with the advent of the motor car; secondly, at the stubborn stupidity of our continued use of such a polluting device when greener solutions surely exist.

Balázs Kicsiny’s The State of Play in 2013 (2013) is like the echo of a performance piece, consisting of a felt-lined table resembling a pool table, but without any pockets, its surface scorched haphazardly. On an adjacent tabletop of the same dimensions as the pool table, a looped film showing how the table arrived at its present state is projected down. A faceless performer cues blazing snooker balls into each other, quite literally playing with fire. The fact that there are no pockets to pot the balls into suggests the ‘game’ is either an entirely futile exercise in destruction. The game has produced a piece of art at the end and seems, in that sense, to comment quite playfully on the artistic process, but playing with fire retains the suggestion of something darker.

Postcard from Budapest

Balázs Kicsiny, The State of Play, 2013

Luca Gőbölyös’s extraordinary series of photographs entitled ‘Background’ (2013) is arguably the highlight of the exhibition. Gőbölyös’s images are based on a remarkable convention in portrait photography of the Victorian era, when exposure times were long enough to allow mothers to disguise themselves with veils and other clothing in order to blend into the background whilst holding their babies still for the camera. Gőbölyös’s works are a contemporary reimagining of this peculiar phenomenon. Like Linda Fregni Nagler’s series ‘The Hidden Mother’, included in the main exhibition at last year’s Venice Biennale, these works force us to (re)consider the role of mothers and women more generally. In the context of post-communist Hungary, traditional family values have been increasingly reinforced with discourses about the ‘proper’ role of women as mothers propagated by a conservative government and media. Gőbölyös’s work is such a triumph as it embodies the old feminist mantra that the ‘personal is the political’ in a way that is not trite or clichéd, but highly effective and striking. Her photographs serve as a very personal record of her journey through early-motherhood, reminding us that no matter how close the bond between parent and child, they will eventually have to separate. They also remind us that mothers are simply expected to sacrifice everything for their children, and that they are supposed to do so silently. Even today, the majority of domestic labour the world over is carried out by women and it is for the most part unpaid, unrewarded and rarely recognised. Clearly, Gőbölyös felt no need to self-censor her bludgeoning critique of Hungary’s current political context and credit to the gallery displaying something so overt.

Even in the most draconian of political climates, art has a habit of surviving and thriving, providing a medium for dissent and sometimes even galvanising a movement of genuine political resistance. Whilst this observation may provide little consolation for the country’s artists who’ve fallen victim to the government’s stringent funding criteria, the early promise of the New Budapest Gallery surely offers some.

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

$
0
0

By Geeta Dayal

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

Robert Ashley, 2006 (Photo: Joanne Savio)

Friends and collaborators of influential US composer Robert Ashley remember his life and work

The composer Robert Ashley died last week at his home in New York, age 83. Though he is best known for radically reinventing opera in the 20th century — most famously in the television opera Perfect Lives in the early 1980s — his life and career had many stages. He was a key part of the legendary ONCE Group in Ann Arbor, beginning in 1961, and formed the Sonic Arts Union in 1966 with fellow composers Alvin Lucier, Gordon Mumma, and David Behrman. In 1969, Ashley became the director of the nascent Center for Contemporary Music at Mills College in California. At Mills during the 1970s, he mentored a generation of groundbreaking artists and composers. Ashley’s last opera, CRASH, which was completed three months before his death, will receive its world premiere at the Whitney Biennial next month, directed by musician and composer Alex Waterman, along with performances of the operas Vidas Perfectas (Perfect Lives revisited in Spanish) and The Trial of Anne Opie Wehrer and Unknown Accomplices for Crimes Against Humanity. Here, 23 of Ashley’s friends and collaborators look back on his life and work.
– Geeta Dayal

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

Robert Ashley, 1989. (Courtesy: Mimi Johnson; Photo: Jack Mitchell)

Alvin Lucier
Composer and emeritus professor, Wesleyan University; co-founder of the Sonic Arts Union with Ashley, Mumma, and Behrman

Throughout a long career Robert Ashley did an astonishing thing. He turned speech into music. The origins of speech and music are mysterious. One cannot be sure which came first. One can imagine that the first human utterances were intoned, chanted, if not melodic. Song may have been the precursor of speech. Or they both may have developed simultaneously. It is lovely to imagine early humans singing to each other. Ashley’s speech-song seems to me to be a combination of both. It is fascinating to hear the characters in Bob’s operas singing and talking at the same time. The listener’s attention moves to three places: the meaning of the words, the melody they create and a combination of both.

Basically, Ashley regarded speech as music. I remember standing with him at gatherings after concerts in the Midwest, simply listening to people talking. He once remarked that, to his ears, the dull roar of many people talking was symphonic. Once as an accompaniment to a Merce Cunningham event in New York, Bob simply assembled a group of friends to sit on stage and have a conversation. There was no text, no instructions, no enhancements, no musical accompaniment. It was amazing just how riveting this experience was. One left the event wondering how Bob could have made this happen.

‘Blue’ Gene Tyranny
Composer and pianist; music, Perfect Lives, Celestial Excursions, Dust

We first met in 1962; I’d come up from Texas. I was 17 years old and I had just left home and had all my belongings in a paper bag and I decided to come to Ann Arbor because I was doing new music in Texas as a teenager, working with my friend Philip Krumm. [Ashley] said ‘You gotta come up here, these people are doing wonderful new stuff’… I decided that was where I wanted to go. I took my student composer’s award, which was about $500, and took the plane first to New York to do a Juilliard audition, but then caught the bus to go to Ann Arbor… I went to Ann Arbor and stayed in Gordon Mumma’s place for a couple days, and then Mary Ashley and Bob helped me get a job at the Institute for Social Research. And that gave me a place to live. It didn’t work out to go to the university — I wasn’t terribly interested anyway. But I worked with Bob for over 50 years.

We were close friends, of course. The whole ONCE thing wasn’t just a festival we put on once a year; it was a continuous lifestyle. It was the beginning of the ‘60s. Everything went into it; it was always there every day. For everybody involved it was happening all of the time. Bob was one of the main movers of the activity of the ONCE Group, and the ideas. ONCE started as a new music concert, in ’61, actually. They had the first one the year before I came up there. I believe John Cage was with that, and David Tudor…all the newest music of the time.

I stayed in Ann Arbor from ‘62 to ‘70. Then Robert invited me to the Center for Contemporary Music at Mills College in Oakland, to help put the studio together. When I got there, it was two small rooms. We expanded the whole thing down one half of a building and made it non-profit, public access. Which was the expansion of an idea that Robert had. Robert with Gordon Mumma, in Ann Arbor they were calling it the cooperative studio of electronic music, and [had] basically two electronic setups in their houses but they wanted to expand it, to make it public access so that anybody could use it. So that’s what the Center for Contemporary Music came from…anybody from the public could use it, and the students could show people how to do things. Part of the learning was to teach others how to use synthesizers, or the film editing equipment…to anybody from the community.

So, yes, Bob and I worked together for many years, and made Perfect Lives. He invited me to write the music that I was familiar to play with. It was a different kind of relationship, sort of like co-composition. I wrote the melodies and the harmonies and all that stuff, and that gave me something that I could develop the character of Buddy the piano player, who comes to town and teaches everyone boogie-woogie and that sort of thing. He’s the eternal optimist. Then there was Raoul, the eternal pessimist, the bartender, always questioning things. It sort of described us (laughs) We were interested in everything.

Gordon Mumma
Composer; emeritus professor, University of California – Santa Cruz; veteran of ONCE Festivals, Sonic Arts Union, Merce Cunningham Dance Company

Robert Ashley lived off the land and in the landscapes. With the people therein he shared the surroundings. The following early history displays some roots of his lifelong creativity.

Beginning musically as a solo pianist, it was a path Ashley might have followed, but pianos are heavy. Words have a different kind of weight, combining naturally in ensembles of verbal communities. His involvements with spoken words and communications of language invited participations with others. Nourishment came from the visual artists in his life, beginning in the 1950s with Mary Tsaltas, filmmaker George Manupelli, architects Harold Borkin and Joseph Wehrer, and visual-projection sculptor Milton Cohen.

Ashley’s early use of recorded media — magnetic tape — in both fixed and live-performance was integrated by working with others. He and I collaborated and developed music for Milton Cohen’s SPACETHEATRE, constantly evolving and with ongoing public performances for several years. Ashley composed music then mostly for ensembles — small and large, and I still treasure the touring duo-performances of our music and that of others.

That’s old history — the developing of his early creative gardens. But as roots develop, so did Ashley’s social strands. He was wonderful in working with others, though not fully as a ‘director.’ He invited people to collaborate, appreciating their uniqueness, as though having a long party. Ashley’s ingredients for these activities came from his entire life. The surrounding and luminescent Americana libretti of his words are now an ongoing new history.

Pauline Oliveros
Composer; professor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

In the early ’60s, we were in snail mail contact with Robert Ashley. We (Ramon Sender Barayón & Morton Subotnick) were excited about connecting with Bob and the ONCE Group in Ann Arbor — the only group that seemed to be working with tape and electronics in ways parallel to what we were doing in San Francisco.

In 1964, we took our group on a national tour and met Bob and the ONCE Group in Mt. Pleasant, Michigan. They attended our concert; then we all went to Ann Arbor for a wonderful party and exchange of information.

Following on are some of my continuing encounters with Bob:

Early ’60s snail mail exchange with Bob & Ramon. Hearing Bob’s tape music at our San Francisco Tape Music Center.
1964 meeting Bob in person in Michigan on our tour and hanging out with him and the ONCE Group in Ann Arbor.
The Wolfman in LA [1968] – jaws dripping with feedback!
Experiencing The Trial of Anne Opie Wehrer… with Anne riding on Bob’s shoulders in a theatrical trance at UCSD circa 1970.
Kittyhawk [c.1965] with the ONCE Group at the Walker Art Center in Minneapolis.
On location in Joshua Tree National Monument for Dr. Chicago— a George Manupelli film with Ashley sound and Alvin Lucier as Dr. Chicago.
Music with Roots in the Aether— my theatrical interview with Bob at Mills College, Oakland.

All these encounters touching deeply the curious flow of our music and friendship.

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

Robert Ashley, Automatic Writing, (cover of 1996 CD release)

John Bischoff
Composer and associate professor, Mills College, Oakland

I first saw Robert Ashley in person when I was a 19-year-old composition student at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music in 1969. Ivan Tcherepnin, who taught the Composition Seminar course I was taking, had lined up guest composers to lecture to the class. Bob was one of them. He was the only guest who didn’t play recordings of his pieces—he just sat in front of the class and talked extemporaneously for an hour straight. I remember being transfixed.

It wasn’t clear to me at the time that he even composed music, at least from what he said that day—but it didn’t matter. That experience was what led me to apply to Mills for graduate school a few years later, and to end up studying with Bob. It was one of the best decisions I ever made.

Maggi Payne
Composer, video artist, professor and co-director, Center for Contemporary Music, Mills College; sound engineer, Music with Roots in the Aether

I first encountered Bob Ashley when he performed Wolfman at the University of Illinois at Urbana [in 1969], when I was about to enter graduate school there. Although I know that his vocalizations were extremely soft, the amplitude through the sound system was so intense that I managed to stay inside the concert hall for only a few seconds before making a hasty retreat to the lobby with my fingers in my ears. Luckily there was a window in the door to the concert hall and there was certainly no difficulty hearing that amazing performance through the door, which was vibrating against my hand as I peered through the glass.

Gordon Mumma was in residency the year I was there. When I was trying to decide whether to stay for a further degree at Illinois, Gordon Mumma said ‘go to Mills College to study with Bob Ashley,’ advice which I took, and a decision I never regretted for a moment. It was such a pleasure working closely with Bob while at Mills, and especially as sound engineer for several interviews and performances for Music with Roots in the Aether.

Between the production crew skinny dipping to cool off in the intense heat at Terry Riley’s Sri Moonshine Ranch, to the quarry shots of Gordon Mumma and Tandy Beal at dawn, to being whisked to the top of Angel Island for David Behrman’s interview with that wonderful helicopter opening, to Phil Makanna’s intricate mirror setup for David’s Music with Melody-Driven Electronics, and Bob’s brilliant idea of having signers interpret involuntary utterances in his Title Withdrawn— it was all magical.

Prior to the Terry Riley shoot, I remember him recounting that he ordered a cheeseburger without the meat at a hamburger chain, but the kid refused to make it for him. Bob asked him to ‘hold the meat’ just like one would say ‘hold the mayo,’ but the kid would have none of it. Bob couldn’t make any headway with that kid, and he remained perplexed as to why it was such a problem for the kid for weeks after that incident.

I can’t really imagine this world without Bob. He was one of the most charismatic people I’ve known. He is a major influence in 20th and 21st century music. It’s as if his influence becomes part of one’s DNA without one really being aware of it.

Paul DeMarinis
Electronic media artist and composer; professor, Stanford University

From a 1976 B&W reel-to-reel videotape – Cathy Morton and Bob Ashley:

(Bob is wearing a beautiful suit that looks as if it is tailored from a striped cotton tablecloth.)

Cathy Morton: This is hereditary. I‘m not sure if Bob can do it, but I can do it. (turns to Bob) Can you do it? (whispers)

Bob Ashley: (mumbles something, smiles)

Cathy Morton: We’re going to sing an A, a perfect A 440. Ready Bob?

On Cue {

Cathy Morton: Aaaaahhhhh (sings A 440)

Bob Ashley: eeeeeehhhh… (sings C)

—-

At one point in my graduate career at Mills, the time when any responsible teacher would have had to lay it out that I just didn’t have it, Bob said to me, out of the blue,

‘You should become a visual artist.’

I said, ‘but I like to make music.’

Bob said, ‘That’s ok. You can just keep on doing what you’re doing. You’ll just make different friends.’

‘Oh.’

Laetitia Sonami
Sound artist, composer, and performer

If you peered at the group of students in Bob Ashley’s seminar at Mills College in the late seventies, you would think you stumbled on one of his operas, exhibiting the oddest brochette of characters. I was young, still fresh from Paris and I could not believe where I had landed — there were so many incredible thinkers, budding artists, engineers, inventors, misfits, and everyone looked odd and thought in ways that seemed so foreign to me, and we were all completely set on fire by Bob’s charisma and generosity.

I could not say what Bob taught us — we still joke that we are not even sure he was there that often — going back and forth as he was between Beach St. and the Lake Merritt Hotel (‘Being in Oakland is like being in heaven’ – this, when San Francisco had not colonized the area yet.)

David Behrman, John Bischoff, Maggi Payne, Phil Harmonic, Nick Bertoni, Frankie Mann, Rich Gold, Bill Farley, Paul DeMarinis, Blue Gene Tyranny and so many more before and then — we still see each other, bounded by a love for the edges.

Bob wanted to be enchanted, delighted — and he created a huge place for you to unfold — Did not care about good or bad, just that you had to relish what you were doing, occupying all possible pockets of dead space, and f*** the conventions whenever possible.

Oh boy… was he there when he was here — now that he is not here, I think he is as much there…

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

Robert Ashley Perfect Lives, 1978–83

William Farley
Director and filmmaker

During the early ’70s, I was privileged to have dinner with the Ashleys a couple of nights a week, and they always played unusual music from around the world. It was background when Bob and Mary were cooking and did not interrupt the flow of conversation. They had played one particular album of African music for a couple of weeks until Bob complained one evening that his pants were getting tight around the waist. Mary agreed that they were both gaining weight? At the time I had the metabolism of a hummingbird and had not noticed any fluctuation of my weight. Bob picked up the album and read the English translation below the French, and in the small print discovered that we had been listening to Pygmy food gathering music. And realized that listening to hungry people looking for food in the rainforest of Central Africa was making us all overeat. Needless to say that album went back on the shelf and I never heard them play it again.

David Rosenboom
Composer; professor and dean of the School of Music, CalArts

I’ve never forgotten coming away from one of many inspiring conversations with Bob — probably sometime in the ‘70s — in which an important principle about composing emerged in our dialogue. I still pass the idea on to my students today. It went something like, ‘Whenever you believe you have a new idea, always imagine what bigger idea this one is just a part of.’ Few individuals can lay claim to having created a new language for music, so thoroughgoing, original and complete as to recast a constellation of notions about music, performance art, language, narrative form, opera, new media, history, time, collaborative strategies, form and structure, sociocultural themes in art and the evolution of musicianship, to name a few, in an integrated synthesis that challenges and deeply informs our searching as participants in the evolution of music. On another occasion — maybe in the ‘80s — we were talking again, and he said something like, ‘I’m becoming more interested in producing than composing, it’s certainly more important than orchestration.’

I treasure many memories. But here’s a wild one. In the late ‘60s I was managing productions for a multimedia concert series at the Electric Circus in New York called ‘Electric Ear.’ On May 26th, 1969 our project was to produce a performance by the ONCE Group from Ann Arbor of Bob’s The Trial Of Anne Opie Wehrer And Unknown Accomplices For Crimes Against Humanity. Well, a great swirl of confusion and curious tension bubbled up when the unanticipated political stumping of Norman Mailer bumped up against Bob’s presentation. I believe our producer, Thais Lathem, had a history in political campaigning. If I’m not mistaken, I think she worked on the Hubert Humphrey campaign.

Well, she had somehow gotten involved, maybe only peripherally, maybe more, with Norman Mailer’s campaign to become mayor of New York City. Somehow, it came to pass that Norman’s entourage arrived in the Circus environment to make a public showing just prior to the start of Bob’s concert. But the idea to combine the two didn’t work out so well, and as I recall, Bob wasn’t too pleased about the distraction. There was mayhem. Finally things settled a little, Bob’s performance began, and I helped him with the unique, Electric Circus control technology that had been designed by Don Buchla. His piece was a talking piece, with Anne Wehrer, George Manupelli, the great experimental filmmaker, and others. Anne had been in Andy Warhol films and was married to Joe Wehrer at the time, a famous architect at the University of Michigan. I recall five people on stage. I believe they were Mary Ashley, Cynthia Liddell, George Manupelli and Joe Wehrer, with Anne in the middle being cross-examined by two others on each side. Anne was a virtuoso talker – talk, talk, talk – an amazing person, and Bob knew how to orchestrate extraordinary people. It’s a legendary piece. I don’t know how it could have been done without Anne. In the end, Norman’s earlier appearance was no match for her with Bob and his team, not even close.

There are many stories to tell, like when we produced the CD of Bob’s opera, Improvement, in ‘80s summer recording sessions at the Center for Contemporary Music at Mills College. Each singer delivered individual phrases from an isolation booth, over and over, seemingly endlessly, while waiting for feedback and receiving almost none. After some exasperation they would ask Bob, ‘What are you looking for?’ And his reply would simply be, ‘I’ll know it when I hear it.’ After one session, we all went out to gawk at lowrider cars.

Honorific appellations, in America at least, usually go to those whose work takes less time to understand and recognize within extant, a priori conceptual frameworks than Bob’s does. Bob’s work is simply too challenging to be understood fully until those attempting to do so can strip away their assumptions about what art and music can be. I’m reminded of a moment in the early ’70s when I was editing a journal and had asked Bob to contribute an article. It arrived, and I read its unforgettable title referring to the problematic of music notation, ‘When The Virus Kills the Body And Is Buried With It, The Virus Can Be Said To Have Cut Its Own Throat,’ a good place to stop for a bit of contemplation.

Rhys Chatham
Composer; music director of The Kitchen, 1972–1973 and 1977–1980

I booked Bob at The Kitchen during the mid-‘70s. That was how I met him, through my friends Peter Gordon and Jill Kroesen and others, who studied with him at Mills College. I was in my mid-20s; Bob was in his early 50s. His take on me as a concert producer was as follows: ‘Rhys wants to be a composer, but we don’t need more composers, we need FANS! Rhys is a FAN!’ Bob was right — I was a fan. I still am, in fact!

I somehow managed to muddle my way through things, and also became a composer. My role model was Bob. Heck, I loved his music, but what I wanted to be, when I attained his age, was not to write music exactly like his, but to BE like him. Why, I’d go to his house and see instruments all over the place and Susan Sontag’s book On Photography on the table, and I thought to myself, ‘Holy guacamole, this is what being a composer is all about.’ Never mind his cool shades and sleek look, and his winning way with words; this was a beautiful man, someone to look up to, as virtually all of my close personal friends of my generation did.

Bob inspired us to become what we could become. Hell! His music was so weird, and he didn’t do so badly, maybe we could do the same thing. That was my thought, at least. People who studied directly with him like Jill and Peter could tell you.

So I wrote this piece in his memory. It’s for an orchestra of a lot of alto and C flutes. I’m playing all the parts for now. You wanna download it? Be my guest! Music should be free, just like love, would be my thought. If you do so, just make sure to tell your friends: this one is for Bob!

Download link here

)

Thomas Buckner
Baritone vocalist and performer; singer on Atalanta (Acts of God), Improvement, eL/Aficionado, Your Money My Life Goodbye, Dust, Celestial Excursions, Concrete

The first time I heard an opera performance by Robert Ashley was on record, when I arrived home one evening around 1980. A friend who was babysitting at my home was listening to the new recording of a solo performance of two scenes from Perfect Lives— ‘The Bar’ and ‘The Park’ — with Bob, ‘Blue’ Gene Tyranny on keyboard, and ‘Chris’ on tabla. Ironically, I didn’t get it at first, but my friend, (whom I married years later), insisted I listen some more. Soon thereafter, I was singing at the Autumn Festival at the American Center in Paris, and Bob was performing a solo version of the same music, with the players on a recording. I was blown away, and he became one of my favorite composers. We had a very interesting conversation, in which Bob spoke of the necessity to get one’s music out there at every opportunity, no matter what venue. It was just what I needed to hear. His spirit was infectious.

Why did I reject this music at first, and then become so enamored of it later? I think it is because Robert Ashley’s music represents a radical, in the sense of root, departure from not only the music of the past, but from western music’s assumptions about the relationship of speech and music. For him, speech is music, and it took the experience of a live performance for me to hear this. Also, in live performance, Bob’s charismatic presence was not to be denied, and the effect was both mesmerizing and awakening.

So when the Arch Ensemble for Experimental Music — which I co-founded and co-directed with composer/conductor Robert Hughes in Berkeley, California — was given a consortium grant to commission a composer, I readily agreed to his suggestion of Robert Ashley, whom he called ‘the most original mind in new music.’ I stipulated that the work be for voice and ensemble, as I wanted to experience this music from the inside. Because he had heard me sing, Robert Ashley chose to set text from his then-current opera, Atalanta (Acts of God), rather than a new text. Little did I know that this would be an audition.

Bob had written out the speech rhythms in conventional notation, since we were not going to be working together on the piece. This was very complicated, in order to capture the subtle nuances, the music, of vernacular speech. I understand why Bob never used conventional notation for the singers in his operas; it is very inefficient. I practiced it with the great hand drummer Big Black, who was my roommate at the time, and we really got it locked in. So when I sang it for Bob he was very happy. He came out to San Francisco for the performance and then invited me to sing in the next performance of Atalanta (Acts of God), which was in Rome. I have sung in every opera since, as well as in many concert performances of shorter works he has written for me. I learned more about music and performance from working with Bob than from any other experience in my life. Each piece is unique, though recognizable as Bob’s work. He reinvented opera every time he wrote one.

Jill Kroesen
Composer and performer; ‘Isolde/Gwyn’ in Perfect Lives

Bob Ashley was brilliant, open and generous. I was privileged to study with him at Mills College. To be his student was to be in the best hands. He exposed us to as much contemporary art and music and he could and then left us on our own with his unconditional support. The only requirement was that our work be innovative. He treated us with the respect of an equal and listened to our work with awe. He was there if we needed help or feedback and listened with an open heart. I worked with him later on Perfect Lives and with that and all his other compositions there was never any ego artifice, just pure art.

Peter Gordon
Composer and associate professor, Bloomfield College; music producer for Perfect Lives and Vida Perfectas

I was a graduate student at the University of California-San Diego, where music was all about expanding parameters and ever-increasing control. The music campus was a former marine base: the classrooms and studios were barracks and quonset huts. This gave a nice edge to the place. The one “nice” building was commandeered by a well-funded musical think tank, where experimentalist pedagogues picked through the entrails of linguistics and cybernetics.

Robert Ashley came down for a weekend to rehearse and perform his opera Kit Carson. He used music and art student volunteers. Bob was the lead voice, reading a series of newspaper articles that were covering a big scandal at the time, involving ITT Corporation, the CIA and the Republican Party fundraising (Nixon had just been re-elected.) In his introductory remarks, Bob explained how the opera was entitled Kit Carson because the structure of the work was based on the political, economic and social dynamic of the Wild West.

I loved it – weird music, sharp politics, and the rehearsals were a good hang. I knew that I had to work more with Bob, and immediately applied to transfer to Mills College, where Bob was on the faculty. Some of the things that struck me about Bob: a.) He made everything seem so effortless. There were things to be done and one just did them – no drama. b.) He was extremely kind to everyone working for him. c.) Bob was interested in people – he’d talk to folks, regardless of stature, position, nature of connection. d.) Bob was able to see music within a social context – with political awareness, as well as an appreciation for popular culture. e.) Bob was rigorous in thought and action. His works were meticulously planned, with layers of connection and specific formulae in which things should work. f.) Notwithstanding b. above, Bob did have high standards regarding technology, and was very clear in his tech specifications. He expected these to be met and woe unto the presenter who tried to cut corners.

I moved up to the Bay Area, enrolled at Mills. The program that Bob had created (along with ‘Blue’ Gene Tyranny, Maggi Payne, Terry Riley, et al) was a polar opposite to what I had experienced at UCSD. There was the dedication to experimentalism, but there was also a sense of what Bob had described as ‘music as news.’ And pop music was considered part of the dialogue. The Center for Contemporary Music, which housed the MFA music program, featured a room with a Moog, a room with a Buchla synthesizer, and an 8-track professional recording studio. ‘Blue’ Gene was the head engineer, and major musicians from the San Francisco Bay Area would come to record. The mid-‘70s seemed to be the time of the great migration. We had heard tales out in California about the exciting stuff happening in downtown New York. I moved to the East Village in ’75; Jill Kroesen was already here and Bob was commuting between Oakland and New York. Everyone was out of school, one way or another, and Bob (with Mimi, now) was the center of our community of artists. Before I met Bob, I recall a UCSD professor making some derisive comment about ‘Those folks at Mills – they are like insurance salesmen: businessmen.’ It is true, however, that Bob had a good sense of the connection of music to commerce. This is not to say that he was in any way creating ‘commercial music’ – but his experience in industrial film and applied music and sound production definitely informed his technological awareness.

And Bob knew how to put on the charm, in particular when doing business. The big piece of Bob’s that I worked on was Perfect Lives. I was music producer and, working with Bob and ‘Blue’ Gene, we spent hundreds of hours recording in 24-track studios. This was primarily at Right Track Studios – first at their W. 24th Street facility in New York, later on W. 48th Street. We treated the studio as one great big modular synthesizer: we made it a point to utilize all of the available outboard gear, and there was a great selection available, indeed. We pushed the studio engineers to use the gear in unusual ways. Today, I am revisiting the process, but this time using Ableton Live (musical software) on a laptop.

At one of the first Robert Ashley concerts I attended, there was this strange mechanical rhythm sound on a track (I think this was for a live performance of the score to George Manupelli’s film Portraits). It seemed slightly incongruous at first, but I became fascinated with the repetition. It turns out that this was a keyboard instrument called the ‘Chamberlain.’ It is similar to the Mellotron, in that it is comprised of tape loops that are triggered by the keyboard. But the Chamberlain had a whole set of rhythmic presets, designed in particular for Hollywood television shows. The mechanical rhythm of the Chamberlain (there was one in the Mills studio) was the precursor to the Gulbransen organ rhythms of Perfect Lives; both might be seen as precursors to musical software such as Ableton.

Bob was my teacher, my colleague, my collaborator. He was my guru, my mentor, my inspiration, my friend.

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

Robert Ashley Perfect Lives, 1978–83

David van Tieghem
Composer and performer; ‘“D”, the Captain of the Football Team’ in Perfect Lives; vocals on Atalanta (Acts of God)

I was privileged to work with Bob on Perfect Lives and Atalanta (Acts of God) from 1978 to 1983. I’ll never forget his gentle, humorous nature, and his generous trust in me to find my own way into and through his work as a performer. His voice hypnotized me, and forever influenced the way I perceive the rhythm of words and imagery.

John Sanborn
Video artist; director of the television opera Perfect Lives

Bob had the ability to teach you just by being Bob. His first major manifestation was the video interview collection called Music with Roots in the Aether, which I found objectionable when I first heard that a musician thought he could make video. I was wrong, because 1. Bob was the conductor of bands that could do anything (I was going to join one) and 2. Bob taught me how to control the content AND the context. When you do that you leave NO ROOM for the competition.

Then came Perfect Lives, a sweet rumour for a while, and then a set of smoky temperaments that I was invited to connect with by Carlotta Schoolman. I was the hot young video artist whose prowess was abbreviated by pronounced context, but slender content. But Bob changed that. When we worked together I understood how to construct yourself — sometimes in real time — with language, perspective and commentary. Bob would not so much tell you what he wanted, as ‘guide’ you to a target (sometimes of your own making) that would make him laugh. ‘Good one, John’ he would say, and cover his famously bad teeth when he smiled.

I saw how deep and intense his commitment to the text and the concept of Perfect Lives was — this was no trivial love affair. And when we were invited to make a pilot of the piece with Belgian TV (weeks and weeks in Liege drenched in old school technology, beer and twins) and we could not agree to a contract with their administration — we found ourselves breaking into the studio, stealing the master tapes, and driving all night to Amsterdam. Just like a Bob Ashley opera. Oh, boy.

Yes, Bob absorbed your talent in his name, yes; he pulled your strings and seduced you with his force of personality (so subtle is his will that you have given up the ghost before breakfast.) And yes, there is the time when you have to leave the band to go do your own thing — no hard feelings. BUT— how glorious is was to be playing with Peter, Blue, Jill, David and Bob to create something that — STILL and MAYBENEVER— will never be beat.

So through my head run the lines that I know by heart. Whose meaning maybe (maybe) only I know (since I spent weeks talking through each word of seven episodes to divine how to show that which cannot be seen.) And when I am in a sort of doubt, or panic, or miasma I hear– ‘short ideas, repeated, massage the brain.’ And Bob lives on, forever.

Jacqueline Humbert
Artist and performer; costume designer and makeup, Perfect Lives, Atalanta (Acts of God); performer in several operas including Your Money My Life Goodbye, Dust, Celestial Excursions

It is difficult to express how significant an impact, how great an influence one life can have on another. I will make an attempt though it will be incomplete and inadequate.

I had known of Robert Ashley’s innovative music for years before beginning to work with him in 1980, first as a designer and subsequently as a performer. I admired his great intelligence and astonishing imagination. He was astoundingly prolific as well. Over the years he became a north star for me, an inspiration, a creative genius and one of the best friends I’ve ever had.

It was both an honour and a pleasure to have worked with Robert for so many years. Through his many operas the ensemble toured internationally, were recorded and broadcast widely, and given the chance to perform the vivid characters Robert created, so varied from opera to opera. Robert was incredibly generous in providing the many opportunities to all who worked with him for so many years and we are all so very grateful and humbled by the experience.

Robert had it all; grace, charm, wit, and a voice like velvet or smoke, depending on the character. He is already sorely missed. The world has lost one of the truly great ones.

Tom Hamilton
Composer; mixing, sound processing, and/or electronics on Improvement, eL/Aficionado, Your Money My Life Goodbye, Dust, Celestial Excursions

In 1990, Bob knew that I was a composer and audio engineer who was fairly new to New York. He asked me to start working on his electronic orchestras for the operas and perform sound mixing and processing in his ensemble, all which I continue to do to this day. I gained more insight about music in our very first meeting than I had acquired in many years. For me, working on his operas required using everything I had learned from my own checkered experience in music and audio production. Bob’s music provided the context for all of us in the ensemble to stretch our capabilities, each in our own natural direction. And I became connected to a large family of veteran artists, all connected to some aspect of Bob’s career. I think he gave us an original answer to the eternal question: ‘What else is Music?’

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

Robert Ashley, Now Eleanor’s Idea (2007)

Amy X Neuburg
Composer and performer; vocals on Improvement, Foreign Experiences, Now Eleanor’s Idea

A few simple examples of some of the many things I learned from working with him (and you can learn them just from listening): 1) it is perfectly okay to use lots of words; 2) the sounds and rhythms of vernacular speech are beautiful music; 3) if it’s clear to you what you are talking about, it doesn’t necessarily have to be clear to everyone else; they will make their own stories out of what you have said. My favorite of his operas is Foreign Experiences— I still go around quoting it 20 years later. Feeling both tearfully sad and incredibly honoured and grateful to have known him.

Kenneth Goldsmith
Poet and professor, University of Pennsylvania; founder, UbuWeb

I always said, when he was alive, that Robert Ashley was America’s greatest living composer. Like Charles Ives, he was doing things that were so original and unique that few knew in his time knew what to make of them. And like Charles Ives, history will bear out his genius. True to his vision, he never compromised; unlike many artists, he didn’t repeat himself — with each new work, there was a resolute sense of exploration and evolution. He was an artists’ artist. But he paid a price for it. While Steve Reich and Philip Glass made millions at opera houses around the world, Bob premiered works at places like La Mama and The Kitchen right up until the end. It broke my heart.

In my early 20s as a student, a professor of mine gave me a cassette of Perfect Lives. I was dumbstruck by its profundity and beauty. It hit me so hard that I became devoted to the avant-garde because of it. It’s no stretch to say that if not for Robert Ashley, there wouldn’t have been an UbuWeb today.

Robert Ashley: 1930 – 2014

Robert Ashley Vidas Perfectas, 2011. Directed by Alex Waterman, Irondale Theater, Brooklyn, 2011

Alex Waterman
Artist and musician; director of three operas by Robert Ashley for the 2014 Whitney Biennial

My first recollections of Robert Ashley are on a yellow pad of paper. I had been sitting interviewing him at his studio on Beach Street for several hours, recording with a cobbled-together contraption of binaural microphones fed into a pre-amp and an iPod. My preamp ran on a 9-volt battery, and after the first five minutes it lost its charge. I captured five minutes of conversational warm-up and then dead air for the next two hours. I discovered my fuck-up as I was walking to the subway.

Distraught, I pulled out a yellow pad and tried to recollect everything I could from our conversation: Uncle Willard, school days, early years in Tennessee, the Post Office, the army band in Texas, George Payne, Frances Yates, involuntary speech… It was all still present but the order wasn’t. The stories and their structures were intact but the overall sequence wasn’t. It was outside of time.

One of Bob’s gifts has been to remind us that thought is always memory. We remember something new when we encounter his music. The stories that Bob told musically — his form of opera — is always on and off the page simultaneously. The illusion that the audience perceives, is that he and his band are just sitting reading together off of the same page.

In Robert Ashley’s music reading is also a memory exercise, produced through listening to the self and (an)other simultaneously. Musicians do this all the time when they are reading music on the page, but the same rules don’t always get applied to reading words (musically). Words contain magic, though, and Bob understood this in ways that the rest of us are trying to catch up with.

In Bob’s last opera, CRASH (premiering in April at the 2014 Whitney Biennial) knowing that he would be recollecting for the last time, Bob’s story of his life is given an order that perhaps only the finality of an end (‘eresanen’*) could provide.

Bob is at the center, and we are circling around him. His stories progress year by year, and cycle by cycle, measured by minutes and seconds — six cycles of 14 years in 90 minutes. A Perfect Life.

He writes his ‘last big event’ into CRASH, but allows for a coda: in the final ‘shot’ of the opera, Bob is walking home, helped along, on the arm of his wife.

  • ‘eresanen’ (‘there is an end’) is the word that the character No Legs—from Ashley’s 1998 opera, Dust— keeps hearing in his head, and wants to understand.

Sam Ashley
Mystic, composer, and artist; performer in Atalanta, Gentlemen of the Future, Improvement, eL/Aficionado, Now Eleanor’s Idea, Foreign
Experiences, Your Money My Life Goodbye, Empire, Love is a Good Example, Dust, Celestial Excursions, Concrete; performed the dance Seeing Things within early versions of Atalanta; created the two-voice version of Foreign Experiences

I learned a lot from Bob, and I feel honored that I was able to work with him for so many years.

Here’s something interesting: Bob based even his choices about death on an idea of 14 year cycles. This is musically brilliant because it shows what music should really be about: living your ideas; practicing what you preach, as they say. Some people might perhaps be annoyed that he decided to focus specifically on those cycles because of a curious book, and that’s understandable but it’s not really important in this context. And actually I disagreed with his specific focus on just those 14 year cycles. But still, however he might have gotten into the idea the fact that he would make the most fundamental sorts of choices accordingly is impressive as can be.

Just one example.

Outstanding.

Joan Jonas
Video and performance artist; professor emerita at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; choreography on Celestial Excursions

Robert Ashley was a poet in the American tradition. He was charming, charismatic, brilliant. His songs are poems.

One of my favorite tasks was to do the choreography for Celestial Excursions in 2003. There were two versions. The first one I performed behind the readers/singers for the full two hours of the piece. This was challenging and led to new work. For the second version, performed a few years later, I performed only in the musical intervals between the sections with text, because, understandably, my continuous actions were a distraction from the text. I liked the challenge of condensing my actions from two hours to twenty minutes; I experienced different ways of working with time. Robert Ashley’s time. The more I performed the piece the more I realized what a beautiful composer he was.

I knew and admired Bob’s work, but the experience of working with him, the fantastic singers, and ‘Blue’ Gene Tyranny was one of the most profoundly enjoyable moments in my life. This remains my longest continuous solo. The music was my inspiration, of course. I was a backdrop. Hearing the work over and over, especially while inside the sound, was deeply moving. If one loves a work of music it is necessary to listen again and again.

Viewing all 448 articles
Browse latest View live